What is a Base58check? - HedgeTrade Blog


I like Square as a company and see a lot of people are bullish about it. However, a few things stop me from investing. Be interested to hear thoughts but at the moment I am a Square bear.
Jack Dorsey is a visionary. I don’t think this is controversial. However, his track record at Twitter is worrying for shareholders. Be it daily active user growth, ambition with acquisitions but ultimately failure to monetise a fantastic platform where you have big corporations, celebrities and even the President reaching out to 200m daily active users for free. With Square, the closed loop business model of businesses and consumers is again a fantastic concept that could break the power of Visa/Mastercard. Execution remains to be seen, of course.
Square operate in a highly competitive field for consumers and businesses. Let’s take consumers based on Square’s fast-growing Cash App. It offers things a normal bank does like deposits, ATM access, money transfer. If it becomes a fully-fledged bank offering loans, credit; it is competing against the likes of big incumbents (e.g. JP Morgan, Bank of America). Granted they’re dinosaur firms but they already have a huge customer base that are older and, therefore, have more money and deposits. This means it is much easier for them to monetise their customers resulting in high ARPU. Why would these lucrative customers, en-masse, want to uproot their finances to Square when their existing providers will be providing the same service by copying Square, as JP Morgan have done this week? Link
For businesses, Square’s provides software offering (invoicing, PoS, online store) but face strong competition from the likes of Shopify who are taking a fully integrated service approach to SMEs which allows them to take their business online but also manage all their backend processes, including payments. This is a highly convenient service for entrepreneurs. Shopify already has 6% share of the online retail market. Square also provides hardware products which make it easy for SMEs, in particular, to take payments. However, there is evidence that retail is facing a more permanent shift in the US vs. the rest of the world with 60% less footfall today than a year ago Link. 58% of Square’s GPV is from food/drink, retail and professional services. Square may have good market share but it is a shrinking industry.
And as a final piece, competitors in both spaces are generally in very healthy financial shape: Paypal, Shopify, Global Payments, Western Union and big banks are well-capitalised.
Perhaps you can get over the above with the fact that Square has strong network effects and are able to win customers cheaply. However, in my opinion, Square is priced for perfection. Simply looking at a price/sales metric, it is trading 13x LTM. This is high but maybe relatively reasonable for a fast-growing business. However, 25% of Square’s revenue is accounted by Bitcoin “revenue”. This brings little value to Square (2% gross profit) and even Square themselves discount this revenue in their KPIs because it is “out of their control and not reflective of Square’s performance”.
Now onto profits. It is not fair to be too hard on Square’s profitability. After all, it is in high growth phase and its marketing costs were its highest opex line item at roughly 35% for YTD. However, a cursory look at it is Enterprise Value / EBITDA (forward look to Dec2020), it is 242x. If we give credit for Square’s business plan for a further two years, today’s Enterprise Value over broker consensus forecast EBITDA for 2022, it is still a heady 77x. This is when Square is supposed to have EBITDA of $1bn which is three times more than it is forecast for Dec 2020. Priced to perfection.
If you compare it to Paypal, it is trading at 39x and 27x EV / EBITDA for Dec 2020 and 2022.
Square has formidable backers like Ark Invest. I am also not a great believer in “dumb retail” overvaluing a stock for a prolonged period of time. But for reasons above, I am cautious with Square and yet it keeps climbing so please tell me what I am missing…
submitted by dellywally to stocks [link] [comments]

[OWL WATCH] Waiting for "IOTA TIME" 30;

Disclaimer: This is sort of my own arbitrary editing, so there could be some misunderstandings.
I root for the spread of good spirits and transparency of IF.
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 2:45
So why don't we just copy Avalanche? Well that's pretty simple ...
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 2:47
1. It doesn't scale very well with the amount of nodes in the network that have no say in the consensus process but are merely consensus consuming nodes (i.e. sensors, edge devices and so on). If you assume that the network will never have more than a few thousand nodes then thats fine but if you want to build a DLT that can cope with millions of devices then it wont work because of the message complexity.
2. If somebody starts spamming conflicts, then the whole network will stop to confirm any transactions and will grind to a halt until the conflict spamming stops. Avalanche thinks that this is not a huge problem because an attacker would have to spend fees for spamming conflicts which means that he couldn't do this forever and would at some point run out of funds.
IOTA tries to build a feeless protocol and a consensus that stops to function if somebody spams conflicts is really not an option for us.
3. If a medium sized validator goes offline due to whatever reason, then the whole network will again stop to confirm any transactions because whenever a query for a nodes opinion can not be answered they reset the counter for consecutive successful voting rounds which will prevent confirmations. Since nodes need to open some ports to be available for queries it is super easy to DDOS validators and again bring the network confirmations to 0.
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 3:05
4. Avalanche still processes transactions in "chunks/blocks" by only applying them after they have gone through some consensus process (gathered enough successfull voting rounds), which means that the nodes will waste a significant amount of time where they "wait" for the next chunk to be finished before the transactions are applied to the ledger state. IOTA tries to streamline this process by decoupling consensus and the booking of transactions by using the "parallel reality based ledger state" which means that nodes in IOTA will never waste any time "waiting" for decisions to be made. This will give us much higher throughput numbers.
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 3:11
5. Avalanche has some really severe game theoretic problems where nodes are incentivized to attach their transactions to the already decided parts of the DAG because then things like conflict spam won't affect these transactions as badly as the transactions issued by honest nodes. If however every node would follow this "better and selfish" tip selection mechanism then the network will stop to work at all.
Overall the "being able to stop consensus" might not be too bad since you can't really do anything really bad (i.e. double spend) which is why we might not see these kind of attacks in the immediate future but just wait until a few DeFi apps are running on their platform where smart contracts are actually relying on more or less real time execution of the contracts. Then there might be some actual financial gains to be made if the contract halts and we might see alot of these things appear (including selfish tip selection).
Avalanche is barely a top 100 project and nobody attacks these kind of low value networks unless there is something to be gained from such an attack. Saying that the fact that its live on mainnet and hasn't been attacked in 3 weeks is a proof for its security is completely wrong.
Especially considering that 95% of all stake are controlled by avalanche itself
If you control > 50% of the voting power then you essentially control the whole network and attacks can mostly be ignored
I guess there is a reason for avalanche only selling 10% of the token supply to the public because then some of the named problems are less likely to appear
Navin Ramachandran [IF]어제 오후 3:21
I have to say that wtf's suggestion is pretty condescending to all our researchers. It seems heavy on the troll aspect to suggest that we should ditch all our work because iota is only good at industrial adoption. Does wtf actually expect a response to this? Or is this grand standing?
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 3:22
The whole argument of "why don't you just use X instead of trying to build a better version" is also a completely idiotic argument. Why did ETH write their own protocol if Bitcoin was already around? Well because they saw problems in Bitcoins approach and tried to improve it.
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 3:27
u/Navin Ramachandran [IF] Its like most of his arguments ... remember when he said we should implement colored coins in 2nd layer smart contracts instead of the base layer because they would be more expressive (i.e. turing complete) completely discarding that 2nd layer smart contracts only really work if you have a consensus on data and therefore state for which you need the "traceability" of funds to create these kind of mini blockchains in the tangle?
Colored coins "enable" smart contracts and it wouldnt work the other way round - unless you have a platform that works exactly like ETH where all the nodes validate a single shared execution platform of the smart contracts which is not really scalable and is exactly what we are trying to solve with our approach.
Navin Ramachandran [IF]어제 오후 3:28
Always easier to criticise than build something yourself. But yet he keeps posting these inflammatory posts.
At this point is there any doubt if he is making these comments constructively?
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 3:43
If he at least would try to understand IOTAs vision ... then maybe he wouldn't have to ask things like "Why don't you just copy a tech that only works with fees"
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 4:35
I thought this would only be used to 'override' finality, eg if there were network splits. But not in normal consensus
That is not correct. Every single transaction gets booked on arrival using the parallel reality based ledger state. If there are conflicts then we create a "branch" (container in the ledger state) that represents the perception that this particular double spend would be accepted by consensus. After consensus is reached, the container is simply marked as "accepted" and all transactions that are associated with this branch are immediately confirmed as well. This allows us to make the node use all of its computing ressources 24/7 without having to wait for any kind of decision to be made and allows us to scale the throughput to its physical limits. That's the whole idea of the "parallel reality based ledger state" instead of designing a data structure that models the ledger state "after consensus" like everybody else is doing it is tailored to model the ledger state "before consensus" and then you just flip a flag to persist your decision. The "resync mechanism" also uses the branches to measure the amount of approval a certain perception of the ledger state receives. So if my own opinion is not in line with what the rest of the network has accepted (i.e. because I was eclipsed or because there was a network split), then I can use the weight of these branches to detect this "being out of sync" and can do another larger query to re-evaluate my decision.(수정됨)
Also what happens in IOTA if DRNG notes would fall out, does the network continue if no new RNGs appear for a while? Or will new nodes be added sufficiently fast to the DRNG committee that no one notices?
Its a comittee and not just a single DRNG provider. If a few nodes fail then it will still produce random numbers. And even if the whole comittee fails there are fallback RNG's that would be used instead
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 4:58
And multiverse doesn't use FPC but only the weight of these branches in the same way as blockchain uses the longest chain wins consensus to choose between conflicts. So nodes simply attach their transactions to the transactions that they have seen first and if there are conflicts then you simply monitor which version received more approval and adjust your opinion accordingly.
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 5:07
We started integrating some of the non-controversial concepts (like the approval reset switch) into FPC and are currently refactoring goshimmer to support this
We are also planning to make the big mana holders publish their opinion in the tangle as a public statement, which allows us to measure the rate of approval in a similar way as multiverse would do it
So its starting to converge a bit but we are still using FPC as a metastability breaking mechanism
Once the changes are implemented it should be pretty easy to simulate and test both approaches in parallel
Serguei Popov [IF]어제 오후 5:53
So the ask is that we ditch all our work and fork Avalanche because it has not been attacked in the month or so it has been up?
u/Navin Ramachandran [IF] yeah, that's hilarious. Avalanche consensus (at least their WP version) is clearly scientifically unsound.
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 9:43
u/wtf maybe you should research avalanche before proposing such a stupid idea
and you will see that what I wrote is actually true
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 9:44
paying fees is what "protects" them atm
and simply the fact that nobody uses the network for anything of value yet
we cant rely on fees making attack vectors "inattractive"
Serguei Popov [IF]어제 오후 10:17
well (1.) very obviously the metastability problems are not a problem in practice,
putting "very obviously" before questionable statements very obviously shows that you are seeking a constructive dialogue 📷 (to make metastability work, the adversary needs to more-or-less know the current opinion vectors of most of the honest participants; I don't see why a sufficiently well-connected adversary cannot query enough honest nodes frequently enough to achieve that)
(2.) .... you'd need an unpredictable number every few tens/hundreds milliseconds, but your DRNG can only produce one every O(seconds).
the above assumption (about "every few tens/hundreds milliseconds") is wrong
We've had this discussion before, where you argued that the assumptions in the FPC-BI paper (incl. "all nodes must be known") are not to be taken 100% strictly, and that the results are to be seen more of an indication of overall performance.
Aham, I see. So, unfortunately, all that time that I invested into explaining that stuff during our last conversation was for nothing. Again, very briefly. The contents of the FPC-BI paper is not "an indication of overall performance". It rather shows (to someone who actually read and understood the paper) why the approach is sound and robust, as it makes one understand what is the mechanism that causes the consensus phenomenon occur.
Yet you don't allow for that same argument to be valid for the "metastability" problem in avalanche,
Incorrect. It's not "that same argument". FPC-BI is a decent academic paper that has precisely formulated results and proofs. The Ava WP (the probabilistic part of it), on the other hand, does not contain proofs of what they call results. More importantly, they don't even show a clear path to those proofs. That's why their system is scientifically unsound.
even when there's a live network that shows that it doesn't matter.
No, it doesn't show that it doesn't matter. It only shows that it works when not properly attacked. Their WP doesn't contain any insight on why those attacks would be difficult/impossible.
Hans Moog [IF]어제 오후 10:56
That proposal was so stupid - Avalanche does several things completely different and we are putting quite a bit og effort into our solution to pretty much fix all of Avalanches shortcomings
If we just wanted to have a working product and dont care about security or performance then we could have just forked a blockchaib
I am pretty confident that once we are done - its going to be extremely close to the besttheoretical thresholds that DLTs will ever be able to achieve for an unsharded baselayer
Bas어제 오전 2:43
Yesterday I was asked how a reasonably big company no one has heard of could best move forward implementing Access for thousands of locations worldwide. (Sorry for the vagueness, it’s all confidential.) They read the article and want to implement it because it seems to fit a problem they’re currently trying to solve. Such moves will vastly increase the utility of protocols like IOTA, and is what the speculation is built on. I do not think you can overestimate what impact Access is going to have. It’s cutting out the middleman for simple things; no server or service needed. That’s huge.
So yes, I think this space will continue to grow u/Coinnave

Angelo Capossele [IF]2020.10.02.
In short: we are planning a new v0.3.0 release that should happen very soon. This version will bring fundamental changes to the structure of the entire codebase (but without additional features) so that progressing with the development will be easier and more consistent. We have also obtained outstanding results with the dRNG committee managed by the GoShimmer X-Team, so that will also be integral part of v0.3.0. After that, we will merge the Value Tangle with the Message Tangle, so to have only one Tangle and make the TSA and the orphanage easier to manage. And we are also progressing really well with Mana, that will be the focus after the merge. More or less this is what is going to happen this month.
We will release further details with the upcoming Research Status Update 📷

submitted by btlkhs to Iota [link] [comments]

RaizAU Beginners Guide (Updated!)

Many thanks to u/kvramji and u/inertia_2017 whose original Acorns (and subsequently Raiz) guide this is built on top of (with a few FAQs from Raiz themselves).
This post was last updated on October 23, 2020, and I'll endeavour to update it periodically.
What is Raiz?
Raiz is a financial service, helping you to save and invest your money. They enable Australians to start early, invest often, and reach their financial goals.
How does Raiz work?
Raiz helps you proactively invest. One key feature is round-ups; we round up each of your transactions to the nearest dollar, and invest the change into a diversified portfolio. Simply connect a debit card, or other funding source, then provide us with some basic information. We give you the option of choosing a portfolio that is in line with your investment goals and the amount of risk you’re comfortable taking.
Note that Raiz offers other great ways of investing besides round-ups, for more info please see this article.
What are the fees?
Once an account is opened, there are no fees on $0 balances and after that there is a monthly fee as follows:
Portfolio Balance (<$10,000) Balance ($10,000 and up)
All portfolios (exc. Sapphire) $2.50 p/month (charged monthly) 0.275% p.a. (charged monthly, computed daily)
Sapphire $2.50 p/month + 0.275% p.a. (charged monthly, computed daily) $2.50 p/month + 0.275% p.a. (charged monthly, computed daily)
An rough idea of monthly fees on a range of balances can be seen below:
Average Monthly Balance All portfolios (exc. Sapphire) Sapphire
$500 $2.50 $2.61
$1,000 $2.50 $2.73
$2,500 $2.50 $3.07
$5,000 $2.50 $3.65
$10,000 $2.29 $4.79
$20,000 $4.58 $7.08
$50,000 $11.46 $13.96
Any other fees, including any future changes can be found here.
Raiz Beginners Guide
What’s Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA)? Dollar Cost Averaging is basically spreading your investments in such a way that you can take advantage of the ever fluctuating daily price of stocks. The best example of this concept is given in a simple example here.
What do you mean by Portfolio?
Raiz uses the money which is put into the app by making you pick a type of profile which is differentiated from one another by the risk involved, as well as a few other characteristics (socially responsible, or an exposure to Bitcoin). The risk factor varies, depending on the portfolio. A breakdown based on portfolio can be found in the table below, including the minimum suggested investment timeframe (MSIT):
Risk Level (Raiz Defined) Portfolio MSIT
Low Conservative 3 months
Low to Moderate Moderately Conservative 1 year
Moderate Moderate 2 years
Moderate to High Moderately Aggressive 3 to 5 years
High Aggressive 5 to 7 years
Moderate to High Emerald 3 to 5 years
Very High Sapphire 5+ years
NOTE: Once you decide which portfolio to go by, try to not change between portfolios if you see a loss in the value of the account initially. Stick by it and don’t keep changing portfolio, because you might lose more while changing portfolio because it involves selling and buying stocks at different rates.
What portfolio should I pick?
Common question. It all depends on the amount of risk you are willing to take. There are also portfolios available if you'd prefer a socially responsible portfolio, or an exposure to Bitcoin. The longer you intend to hold your money in your account, the higher risk you might be willing to take.
NOTE: Do NOT panic when you see a down day with a loss against your portfolio. The BEST thing you can think of is DCA. If you have set up recurring investments, you are going to see gains as soon as the stocks go up in price.
Which portfolio performs the best?
Common question. Raiz releases an annual report that provides a summary of portfolio performance, typically in August.
Portfolio performance for the past two years, for all portfolios (excluding Sapphire) can be found here.
Something to note: past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Just because a portfolio has done well over the years, it is no guarantee that will continue to be the case, and things such as pandemics, market crashes and the like do happen. Pick a portfolio that suits your needs.
What is Raiz Rewards?
This is a feature in Raiz which gives you some percentage of the money spent for purchasing with vendors they have tie ups with. The method that you use varies slightly for online and in store purchases.
Online Vendors
To ensure you can get the rewards, go to your PC to the online retail store and add items to the cart. Make sure you go via the Raiz website (or App) to the vendor either on the PC or mobile. Finalize the payments via the link that Raiz takes you by and finish the purchase.
In Store Vendors
To ensure you can get the rewards, go to your App, click Rewards -> In-Store.
Click the vendor option, and select 'Activate Now'. Then, go shopping in store with that reward partner. Make sure you use a card that is linked to your Raiz account.
Payment of Rewards
This percentage that is listed in Raiz Rewards can take up to 90 days (typically 30 days for online, 90 days for in store purchases/Raiz Energy) to show up under the Raiz Rewards column in the "History" window in the mobile app. The percentage varies with each vendor.
What about dividends?
Dividends get paid periodically on the ETF holdings that you have, proportional to the amount of each ETF you own on as of the ex-dividend date. These dividends are invested into your Raiz account, approximately one business day after payment date.
Raiz run an annual blog post outlining the dates that dividends are expected to be paid (they vary slightly). That can be found here.
What about taxes?
Raiz will provide you with tax information at the end of financial year which tells you how to report any earnings from your Raiz account. It comes in the form of a Tax Statement, and is typically available in the third week of July.
This can be found in app by going to My Settings -> Support -> View Statements
How long do transactions stay in pending?
Raiz typically takes up to five business days for taking the money from your account and buying shares and for it to show up as processed. So don’t panic if it takes a few days. It’s a common thing.
Well I've read through this and I've got another issue - where can I go for help?
The Raiz Support crew are available to help you out with your Raiz issues. I've had personal experiences in the past where I've needed a hand, and they've been really great.
You can find more info on how to contact them on the Raiz Support webpage. Or hit them up on Twitter, Facebook, etc.
submitted by mathmischief to RaizAU [link] [comments]

Royal Vegas Casino Canada 50 free spins bonus on jackpot games

Royal Vegas Casino Canada 50 free spins bonus on jackpot games

Royal Vegas Casino Full Review
Looking for free spins to Royal Vegas Casino Canada? Here you are: 50 free spins on Mega Moolah Abslolootely Mad Jackpot? In addition, get $1200 welcome offer across your first 3 payments.
>> Play Free Spins Now <<

Bonuses & Promotions

We appreciate the bonus and promotional program that this casino has put together for its players for a few reasons.
The first is that the site and the program are not overwhelming and packed with a reload bonus here and a reload bonus there and throw in some free spins three times a day as long as you make ten deposits a week. You know, that type of thing…
Instead, there’s a standard welcome bonus package that’s nothing different than most that you’ll find through internet casinos. But, what creates some real value add opportunities are the loyalty program plus the limited time promotions.
We’re going to detail the current promotion for you in just a minute but, what’s great about it is that there’s no deposit required If you’re on the site to do some betting, you can get in on the action and have some fun participating and spinning the wheel for prizes. It’s frustrating to see some great rewards up for grabs but then read the small print and find out that it’ll cost you hundreds to even get in the running, and that’s not the case here. Play your favorite game and wager as you normally would, and you’re part of the promotion.
>> Play Free Spins Now <<

$1,200 Welcome Bonus Package + 50 Free Spins

New players can get in on a three-part reward that includes both a deposit match plus some free spins on three different designated slot games. That’s good news. The not quite as good news is that you have to rollover the bonus 40 times before you can cash anything out. This site offers two types of tracking, though, so you’ll need to get further clarification on meeting any wagering requirement and find out if you’re on a percentage tracking system or in protected bonus mode as it will make a difference.

The Welcome Package

  • #1: 100% matching bonus up to $400 plus 50 free spins on MEGA MOOLAH
  • #2: 100% matching bonus up to $400
  • #3: 100% matching bonus up to $400

Limited Time Promotions

Royal Vegas features a current promotion that runs for about a month or so, and it also provides information on past contests so new players can get a good idea of what to expect in the future.
When we checked in, the current promotion was “Wild Wins” with a €300,000 instant prize pool at stake. This is the kind of bonus that we like to see because it’s not tied into a deposit requirement. Those types of things get old. You want some extra value while you’re playing instead of having to fund your player account over and over again.
So, the way Wild Wins works (say that three times fast) is that you log in and play your favorite game in the casino. The more you bet, the faster you fill your progress bar with rewards points. Every time you get up to 100% on that meter, you get a spin on the jungle wheel
The jungle wheel has prizes that include free spins, rewards points, or a trip to the bonus round where you can get in on the big stuff. They’re all instant prizes, and you can spin as many times as you fill that progress bar.
>> Play Free Spins Now <<

Royal Vegas Rewards Program

If you’re familiar with online casino VIP programs, you’ll immediately understand this one. It’s a four-tiered club, and every new player is automatically enrolled as soon as they complete registration of their betting account.
The tiers are:
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Platinum
  • Diamond
Silver is the starting point and, just to get the ball rolling, new members get 2,500. From there, points are earned based on your betting, with slots providing one point for every credit bet. Some table games provide at a rate of one point per five credits but, when you get to Classic Blackjack and All Aces Video Poker, you need to do some substantial wagering. It takes 100 credits to earn one point when you play those two games.
As soon as you earn 10,000 in one month, you hit the Gold status and then you’ll receive a birthday present, accelerated earnings, and a monthly loyalty bonus. Get all the way to Platinum with 75,000 points in one month, and all of those rewards are multiplied significantly. Plus, once you reach 5,000 points you can convert them to cash whenever you want. They exchange at €1 for every 1,000 points redeemed. Cash to points and points to cash.

Money Transfers – In and Out

If you’ve read some of our reviews, you may have noticed that we like full disclosure when it comes to banking. We want to see options right up front for everyone to review and not hidden behind a password so that customers need to register to find out if they can even deposit using their financial accounts.
While this casino does provide a good, detailed list of all of the available financial providers that they use for deposits and withdrawals, what it doesn’t provide is accurate information on their turnaround times for processing and any fees that may be imposed.
It does say that some fees may apply, and we do know that there is a minimum 24 hour waiting period before an internal approval is made on cash out requests, but that’s the extent of it.
We’re putting the focus on this because cash outs with Royal Vegas are one of the most discussed topics in player forums about the casino. You will see some very complimentary comments stating they had money in hand within seven days. But, you’ll also find some people report that they went through a very lengthy withdrawal process and didn’t feel that customer service did much to help them or clarify things.
Just like opinions, money issues will vary from person to person so we can’t give a definitive answer here, but you will want to keep this information in mind if you are someone who demands a quick turnaround as you may not find one through this site.
>> Play Free Spins Now <<

Deposit Options

It’s typical for a casino to have many ways to deposit and fewer withdrawal methods and that is also the case here. But, there are so many withdrawal options that the expanded “cash in” list goes on and on. Unless you are a Bitcoin user, your preferred banking method is surely on this list.
The minimum deposit for all of these methods is 10. However, you can sign up with a lower minimum deposit, but then forfeit the free spins that are included in the welcome bonus package.
That’s quite a list, isn’t it?! There are some other currency restrictions but just click on banking and then the deposit tab and you’ll be able to review the currency options that specifically apply to you.


There aren’t specific guidelines on payout approvals and fees. The internal approval takes a minimum of 24 hours and could take longer and then it’s in the hands of the payment processor or bank.
  • Visa Credit Card
  • Visa Debit Card
  • Solo
  • Neteller
  • Skrill
  • ecoPayz
  • Entropay
  • Instant Banking by Citadel
  • WebMoney
  • CartaSi by Moneybookers
  • Diners Club
  • GiroPay by Moneybookers
  • Solo by Moneybookers
  • Nordea by Moneybookers
  • Sofort by Moneybookers
  • Cheque
  • iDebit
As far as fees, we contacted customer service and were told that any charges depend on the method that you’re using. They don’t have published guidelines, so you will want to keep that in mind. We highly suggest contacting customer service and providing your country, currency, the financial method you’re selecting, and approximate transfer amount and get all of the details up front, so you’re not disappointed later.

Game Variety

Thumbs up to Royal Vegas for providing a great variety that includes specialty, video poker, some unusual table games, and both reel and video slots courtesy of Microgaming. Not all of them appear in the mobile casino, so specialty players need to pull up the full website version.

Audio and Video Quality

As long as you have Flash installed first, the user interface is very easy, and the quality is as good as it gets with these particular titles. We found them to be fast loading and the graphics crisp and clear.


  • Microgaming
  • Evolution Gaming
  • Netent

Mobile Casino

171 games appeared for us on an Android device. While we couldn’t find the specialty games, slots, table games, video poker, and the full live casino area were all ready to go for us with a clear picture and touchscreen operation.

Slots: 350 (148 on mobile)

The slot banks are all together as there aren’t different versions separated out, but you can sort them alphabetically or search for a particular title to quickly locate your favorite. Slots can also be played in free play mode so you can try out some without risking money at the same time.

A Few of the Newer Games Include

  • 108 Heroes – Multiplier Fortunes
  • Gnome Wood
  • Emoti Coins
  • Oink Country Love
You can even filter the games with a Hot and Cold designation. If you use that particular function, you’ll get a new list of games with either flames or a snowflake next to them, which is kind of a fun way to narrow down your selections.

Some of the Reel Slots

  • Jurassic Jackpot
  • Bar Bar Black Sheep
  • 7 Oceans
  • Couch Potato
  • Flo’s Diner
  • Jester’s Jackpot
  • Wheel of Wealth
  • Jewel Thief
  • Joker 8000
  • Gladiators Gold

Video Slots

And, what Microgaming is known for, those intricate video slots with amazing graphics and video, and featuring some unusual bonus games.
  • Jungle Jim El Dorado
  • Thunderstruck II
  • Shoot!
  • Jurassic Park
  • Bridesmaids
  • Jekyll and Hyde
  • MegasSpin – Break da Bank Again
  • Game of Thrones
  • Wheel of Wealth – Multiplayer
  • Hitman

Progressive Jackpots

When you talk about slots provided by Microgaming, the focus is usually more on the progressive jackpots as this software giant offers some of the more well-known big money games. Royal Vegas provides a running total of the current combined progressive amounts available on the site. Just in case you were wondering, it was $6.2 million when we last checked.
  • Mega Moolah
  • Mega Moolah Isis
  • Major Millions
  • Cash Splash
  • Treasure Nile
  • King Cashalot
  • Tunzamunni
  • Fruit Fiesta
  • Lots a Loot
  • Jackpot Deuces
  • Wow! Pot
  • Cyberstud Poker
Major Millions, Fruit Fiesta, and Lots a Loot each have two versions, a three reel and a five reel but boast the same top payout amounts.

Video Poker: 26 (seven on mobile)

It can get monotonous to talk about video poker as it’s typically not well-represented on online casinos compared to its presence in brick and mortars. When it is online, there are usually only a few of the most basic games like Jacks or Better and Deuces Wild. While this site’s video poker collection isn’t what you would call massive, there are some fun variations that we appreciate, as it gives those poor neglected poker players some choices.
  • Tens or Better
  • Louisiana Double
  • Deuces Wild 4 Up
  • Aces and Faces Poker
  • Cyberstud Poker
  • Deuces and Joker Power Poker
  • All American
  • All Aces
  • Bonus Poker Deluxe
  • Aces and Eights

Table Games: 50 (eight on mobile)

When you access the table game area, you’ll see 58 tables as opposed to 50 but that’s because the live dealer tables are also included, and we’re breaking them out so you can get a better picture of what this casino has to offer.
A few of the “non live” options include:
  • Double Exposure Blackjack
  • Vegas Strip Blackjack Gold
  • Big Five Blackjack Gold
  • Multi Wheel Roulette Gold
  • Three Card Poker Gold – Single Hand
  • Baccarat Gold
  • Hold ’em High Gold
  • High-Speed Poker
  • European Blackjack Gold Series High Streak
  • Craps

Scratch Cards: 20 (zero on mobile)

Although we didn’t find any of these games on our smartphone, there are plenty of specialty type games on the full website for instant or download play.
  • Flip Card
  • Wild Champions
  • Mumbai Magic
  • Card Climber
  • Golden Ghouls
  • Bowled Over
  • Plunder the Sea
  • Offside and Seek
  • Halloweenies
  • Dawn of the Bread

Casual Games: 33 (zero on mobile)

Another section that we couldn’t find in the mobile casino, but this casual games section has a lot of variety to it
  • Hexaline
  • Keno
  • Four by Four
  • Whack a Jackpot
  • Max Damage and the Alien Attack
  • Pharoah Bingo
  • Electro Bingo
  • Pick ‘N Switch
  • Beer Fest
  • Bubble Bonanza

Live Casino: eight (eight on mobile)

Although live casino doesn’t appear in the middle menu where all of the other gaming menu items are featured, there is a live casino selection from the top menu. Oddly enough, though, when you click on it, it takes you to the main slots area. At first, we didn’t think there was a live casino, but when we headed into the table game section, there were eight live tables in action.
Except for Live Dream Catcher, the tables in the in this area are provided by Evolution Gaming.
  • Live Dream Catcher
  • Live Blackjack
  • Private Blackjack (2)
  • Live Casino Hold ’em
  • Live Caribbean Stud Poker
  • Live Roulette
  • Live 3 Card Poker

Customer Service

  • Contact Email: via contact form
  • Contact Phone (Canada): 1-866-7452416
  • Contact Phone (Australia): 1-800-658640
  • Contact Phone (other areas): different numbers per language in the contact us area
  • WhatsApp: +27 76 073 9635
  • Skype: Link on Contact Page
  • Live Chat: Available 24/7
We did make contact with the customer service department to clarify a few things about their banking minimums and fees. In some forums, we saw that players weren’t answered promptly, but our live chat started within one minute. The most we waited for a reply to one of the questions was three minutes.
On the other hand, we weren’t overwhelmed with the quality of the responses. It was like pulling teeth to try to get an answer and, when we did, it was short and barely scratched the surface of what we asked. So, we can certainly understand the frustration that some people experienced, especially if they were trying to get information on a payout they’re owed.


When we look at a casino that features one and only one software provider, it’s difficult to be creative in our assessment. Microgaming is a top company and offers some of the best games around, so slot players who know these games already know what to expect.
If you pull up the Microgaming website and look at their top “creations,” you’ll find most, if not all, of them on Royal Vegas, not to mention those big jackpot providers like Major Millions.
We do like that this site offers more than just a focus on slots. The specialty games area is chock full of possibilities for people who would rather play something different. There are a lot of players who enjoy keno or bingo or scratch offs, and they’re all set as long as they play the full site version and aren’t mobile casino players.
Video poker and table games are plentiful and have a good variety in addition to a suitable quantity.
Evolution Gaming is behind the live dealer tables, and it’s one of the best for this type of “real person” table action, so that’s another feather in Royal Vegas’ cap.
Taking a look the rest of the service, though, there are some positives and negatives.
>> Play Free Spins Now <<
submitted by freespins1 to u/freespins1 [link] [comments]

[OWL WATCH] Waiting for "IOTA TIME" 20; Hans's re-defined directions for DLT

Disclaimer: This is my editing, so there could be some misunderstandings...
wellwho오늘 오후 4:50
u/Ben Royce****how far is society2 from having something clickable powered by IOTA?
Ben Royce오늘 오후 4:51
demo of basic tech late sep/ early oct. MVP early 2021
Colored coins are the most misunderstood upcoming feature of the IOTA protocol. A lot of people see them just as a competitor to ERC-20 tokens on ETH and therefore a way of tokenizing things on IOTA, but they are much more important because they enable "consensus on data".
All this stuff already works on neblio but decentralized and scaling to 3500 tps
Neblio has 8 mb blocks with 30 seconds blocktime. This is a throughput of 8 mb / 30 seconds = 267 kb per second. Transactions are 401+ bytes which means that throughput is 267 kb / 401 bytes = 665 TPS. IOTA is faster, feeless and will get even faster with the next update ...
Which DLT would be more secure? One that is collaboratively validated by the economic actors of the world (coporations, companies, foundations, states, people) or one that is validated by an anonymous group of wealthy crypto holders?
The problem with current DLTs is that we use protection mechanisms like Proof of Work and Proof of Stake that are inherently hard to shard. The more shards you have, the more you have to distribute your hashing power and your stake and the less secure the system becomes.
Real world identities (i.e. all the big economic actors) however could shard into as many shards as necessary without making the system less secure. Todays DLTs waste trust in the same way as PoW wastes energy.
Is a secure money worth anything if you can't trust the economic actors that you would buy stuff from? If you buy a car from Volkswagen and they just beat you up and throw you out of the shop after you payed then a secure money won't be useful either :P
**I believe that if you want to make DLT work and be successful then we need to ultimately incorporate things like trust in entities into the technology.**Examples likes wirecard show that trusting a single company is problematic but trusting the economy as a whole should be at ...
**... least as secure as todays DLTs.**And as soon as you add sharding it will be orders of magnitude more secure. DLT has failed to deliver because people have tried to build a system in vacuum that completely ignores things that already exist and that you can leverage on.
Blockchain is a bit like people sitting in a room, trying to communicate through BINGO sheets. While they talk, they write down some of the things that have been said and as soon as one screams BINGO! he hands around his sheet to inform everybody about what has been said.
If you think that this is the most efficient form of communication for people sitting in the same room and the answer to scalability is to make bigger BINGO sheets or to allow people to solve the puzzle faster then you will most probably never understand what IOTA is working on.
**Blockchain does not work with too many equally weighted validators.****If 400 validators produce a validating statement (block) at the same time then only one can survive as part of a longest chain.**IOTA is all about collaborative validation.
**Another problem of blockchain is that every transaction gets sent twice through the network. Once from the nodes to the miners and a 2nd time from the miners as part of a block.**Blockchain will therefore always only be able to use 50% of the network throughput.
And****the last problem is that you can not arbitrarily decrease the time between blocks as it breaks down if the time between blocks gets smaller than the average network delay. The idle time between blocks is precious time that could be used for processing transactions.
I am not talking about a system with a fixed number of validators but one that is completely open and permissionless where any new company can just spin up a node and take part in the network.
Proof of Work and Proof of Stake are both centralizing sybil-protection mechanism. I don't think that Satoshi wanted 14 mining pools to run the network.
And "economic clustering" was always the "end game" of IOTA.
**Using Proof of Stake is not trustless. Proof of Stake means you trust the richest people and hope that they approve your transactions. The rich are getting richer (through your fees) and you are getting more and more dependant on them.**Is that your vision of the future?

Please read again exactly what I wrote. I have not spoken of introducing governance by large companies, nor have I said that IOTA should be permissioned. We aim for a network with millions or even billions of nodes.

That can't work at all with a permissioned ledger - who should then drop off all these devices or authorize them to participate in the network? My key message was the following: Proof of Work and Proof of Stake will always be if you split them up via sharding ...

... less secure because you simply need fewer coins or less hash power to have the majority of the votes in a shard. This is not the case with trust in society and the economy. When all companies in the world jointly secure a DLT ...

... then these companies could install any number of servers in any number of shards without compromising security, because "trust" does not become less just because they operate several servers. First of all, that is a fact and nothing else.

Proof of Work and Proof of Stake are contrary to the assumption of many not "trustless" but follow the maxim: "In the greed of miners we trust!" The basic assumption that the miners do not destroy the system that generates income for them is fundamental here for the ...

... security of every DLT. I think a similar assumption would still be correct for the economy as a whole: The companies of the world (and not just the big ones) would not destroy the system with which their customers pay them. In this respect, a system would be ...

... which is validated by society and the economy as a whole probably just as "safely" as a system which is validated by a few anonymous miners. Why a small elite of miners should be better validators than any human and ...

... To be honest, companies in this world do not open up to me. As already written in my other thread, safe money does not bring you anything if you have to assume that Volkswagen will beat you up and throw you out of the store after you ...

... paid for a car. The thoughts I discussed say nothing about the immediate future of IOTA (we use for Coordicide mana) but rather speak of a world where DLT has already become an integral part of our lives and we ...

... a corresponding number of companies, non-profit organizations and people have used DLT and where such a system could be implemented. The point here is not to create a governance solution that in any way influences the development of technology ...

... or have to give nodes their OK first, but about developing a system that enables people to freely choose the validators they trust. For example, you can also declare your grandma to be a validator when you install your node or your ...

... local supermarket. Economic relationships in the real world usually form a close-knit network and it doesn't really matter who you follow as long as the majority is honest. I also don't understand your criticism of censorship, because something like that in IOTA ...

... is almost impossible. Each transaction confirms two other transactions which is growing exponentially. If someone wanted to ignore a transaction, he would have to ignore an exponential number of other transactions after a very short time. In contrast to blockchain ...

... validators in IOTA do not decide what is included in the ledger, but only decide which of several double spends should be confirmed. Honest transactions are confirmed simply by having other transactions reference them ...

... and the "validators" are not even asked. As for the "dust problem", this is indeed something that is a bigger problem for IOTA than for other DLTs because we have no fees, but it is also not an unsolvable problem. Bitcoin initially has a ...

Solved similar problem by declaring outputs with a minimum amount of 5430 satoshis as invalid ( github.com/Bitcoin/Bitcoi…). A similar solution where an address must contain a minimum amount is also conceivable for IOTA and we are discussing ...

... several possibilities (including compressing dust using cryptographic methods). Contrary to your assumption, checking such a minimum amount is not slow but just as fast as checking a normal transaction. And mine ...

... In my opinion this is no problem at all for IOTA's use case. The important thing is that you can send small amounts, but after IOTA is feeless it is also okay to expect the recipients to regularly send their payments on a ...

... merge address. The wallets already do this automatically (sweeping) and for machines it is no problem to automate this process. So far this was not a problem because the TPS were limited but with the increased TPS throughput of ...

... Chrysalis it becomes relevant and appropriate solutions are discussed and then implemented accordingly. I think that was the most important thing first and if you have further questions just write :)

And to be very clear! I really appreciate you and your questions and don't see this as an attack at all! People who see such questions as inappropriate criticism should really ask whether they are still objective. I have little time at the moment because ...

... my girlfriend is on tour and has to take care of our daughter, but as soon as she is back we can discuss these things in a video. I think that the concept of including the "real world" in the concepts of DLT is really exciting and ...

... that would certainly be exciting to discuss in a joint video. But again, that's more of a vision than a specific plan for the immediate future. This would not work with blockchain anyway but IOTA would be compatible so why not think about such things.

All good my big one :P But actually not that much has changed. There has always been the concept of "economic clustering" which is basically based on similar ideas. We are just now able to implement things like this for the first time.

Exactly. It would mean that addresses "cost" something but I would rather pay a few cents than fees for each transaction. And you can "take" this minimum amount with you every time you change to a new address.

All good my big one :P But actually not that much has changed. There has always been the concept of "economic clustering" which is basically based on similar ideas. We are just now able to implement things like this for the first time.

Relax오늘 오전 1:17
Btw. Hans (sorry for interrupting this convo) but what make people say that IOTA is going the permissioned way because of your latest tweets? I don't get why some people are now forecasting that... Is it because of missing specs or do they just don't get the whole idea?

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:20
its bullshit u/Relaxan identity based system would still be open and permissionless where everybody can choose the actors that they deem trustworthy themselves but thats anyway just sth that would be applicable with more adoption
[오전 1:20]
for now we use mana as a predecessor to an actual reputation system

Sissors오늘 오전 1:31
If everybody has to choose actors they deem trustworthy, is it still permissionless? Probably will become a bit a semantic discussion, but still

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:34
Of course its permissionless you can follow your grandma if you want to :p

Sissors오늘 오전 1:36
Well sure you can, but you will need to follow something which has a majority of the voting power in the network. Nice that you follow your grandma, but if others dont, her opinion (or well her nodes opinion) is completely irrelevant

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:37
You would ideally follow the people that are trustworthy rather than your local drug dealers yeah

Sissors오늘 오전 1:38
And tbh, sure if you do it like that is easy. If you just make the users responsible for only connection to trustworthy nodes

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:38
And if your grandma follows her supermarket and some other people she deems trustworthy then thats fine as well
[오전 1:38]
+ you dont have just 1 actor that you follow

Sissors오늘 오전 1:38
No, you got a large list, since yo uwant to follow those which actually matter. So you jsut download a standard list from the internet

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:39
You can do that
[오전 1:39]
Is bitcoin permissionless? Should we both try to become miners?
[오전 1:41]
I mean miners that actually matter and not find a block every 10 trillion years 📷
[오전 1:42]
If you would want to become a validator then you would need to build up trust among other people - but anybody can still run a node and issue transactions unlike in hashgraph where you are not able to run your own nodes(수정됨)
[오전 1:48]
Proof of Stake is also not trustless - it just has a builtin mechanism that downloads the trusted people from the blockchain itself (the richest dudes)

Sissors오늘 오전 1:52
I think most agree it would be perfect if every person had one vote. Which is pr oblematic to implement of course. But I really wonder if the solution is to just let users decide who to trust. At the very least I expect a quite centralized network

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:53
of course even a trust based system would to a certain degree be centralized as not every person is equally trustworthy as for example a big cooperation
[오전 1:53]
but I think its gonna be less centralized than PoS or PoW
[오전 1:53]
but anyway its sth for "after coordicide"
[오전 1:54]
there are not enough trusted entities that are using DLT, yet to make such a system work reasonably well
[오전 1:54]
I think the reason why blockchain has not really started to look into these kind of concepts is because blockchain doesnt work with too many equally weighted validators
[오전 1:56]
I believe that DLT is only going to take over the world if it is actually "better" than existing systems and with better I mean cheaper, more secure and faster and PoS and PoW will have a very hard time to deliver that
[오전 1:56]
especially if you consider that its not only going to settle value transfers

Relax오늘 오전 1:57
I like this clear statements, it makes it really clear that DLT is still in its infancy

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:57
currently bank transfers are order of magnitude cheaper than BTC or ETH transactions

Hans Moog [IF]오늘 오전 1:57
and we you think that people will adopt it just because its crypto then I think we are mistaken
[오전 1:57]
The tech needs to actually solve a problem
[오전 1:57]
and tbh. currently people use PayPal and other companies to settle their payments
[오전 1:58]
having a group of the top 500 companies run such a service together is already much better(수정됨)
[오전 1:58]
especially if its fast and feeless
[오전 2:02]
and the more people use it, the more decentralized it actually becomes
[오전 2:02]
because you have more trustworthy entities to choose of

Evaldas [IF]오늘 오전 2:08
"in the greed of miners we trust"

submitted by btlkhs to Iota [link] [comments]

Most Important Cryptocurrencies

Bitcoin has been known by many to be the most famous decentralized cryptocurrency. However, besides bitcoin there exists other altcoins that confer a great value as well. Are you interested in learning about other cryptocurrencies? Well, bitcoin is not alone. Here are others.
1. Litecoin (LTC)
Statistics show that as of July 2018, Litecoin had per token value of $87.56. The coin was created by former Google engineer and MIT graduate named Charlie Lee. Just like bitcoin, Litecoin is not controlled by any central authority. It uses ''scrypt'' as proof of work. Different from bitcoin, Litecoin has got a faster block generation rate. This means that it offers a faster transaction confirmation.
The coin is based on an open source global payment network. The coin is generally accepted by merchants with the number growing each day. In July 2018, it had a market cap of $5.03 billion.
2. Ethereum (ETH)
It was launched in the year 2015. ETH is a decentralized software platform. It enables Distributed Applications and Smart Contracts to be built and run without downtime, fraud, control or third party interference. There exists a component called ether which acts like a vehicle within the ethereum platform. Developers seeking to develop and run applications within ethereum and investors aiming to purchases other digital currencies are the most interested parties in ether.
Value per token of ethereum as of July 2018 was $474.66 and a market cap of $ 47.84. Ethereum is the second most important cryptocurrency from bitcoin.
3. Zcash (ZEC)
Just like other altcoins, Zcash is an open-source and decentralized cryptocurrency. It was launched in the year 2016. This cryptocurrency is known to offer privacy and selective transparency of transactions. It's a unique feature different from other altcoins, isn't it?
ZEC claims to offer extra security where all the transactions are recorded and published on a blockchain. However, finer details involving the sender and recipient, and the amount are kept private. Statistics show that as of July 2018, Zcash had per token value of $206.23. It had a market cap of $904.85 in the same month.
4. Dash
It was originally known as darkcoin. Dash is a more secretive version of bitcoin. The working of Dash makes transactions almost untraceable. This because it provides anonymity since it works on a decentralized mastercode network.
Dash was launched in January 2014. Since then it has experienced an increase in fan following despite the short period of time. The cryptocurrency was created by Evan Duffield. It can be mined using a GPU or a CPU. Studies indicate that in July 2018, Dash had a market cap of $2.19 billion and value per token of $266.58.
submitted by shomesrobery to Roobetreviewa [link] [comments]

On F-Droid apps and bitcoin donations

The recent post on FOSS android apps and how they can earn money made me curious about their bitcoin donations, so I slapped together a quick script, grabbed the donation addresses from the F-Droid metadata and queried their total received amount.
The result, sorted by total received and valued using some value of today (9366.36 EUR per BTC)

Package address total EUR
net.i2p.android.router 1BPdWwovytfGdBwUDVgqbMZ8omcPQzshpX 100.35295704 939941.92
net.i2p.android 1BPdWwovytfGdBwUDVgqbMZ8omcPQzshpX 100.35295704 939941.92
com.piratebayfree 1KeBs4HBQzkdHC2ou3gpyGHqcL7aKzwTve 76.80127006 719348.34
org.asnelt.derandom 1NZz4TGpJ1VL4Qmqw7aRAurASAT3Cq5S6s 60.84434648 569890.05
com.nononsenseapps.notepad 16DUL1X4yARfM88GN7TV6Y3wQwqrstJs7A 58.40632213 547054.64
ch.blinkenlights.android.vanilla 1adrianERDJusC4c8whyT81zAuiENEqub 52.62216723 492878.16
org.fdroid.fdroid.privileged.ota 15u8aAPK4jJ5N8wpWJ5gutAyyeHtKX5i18 52.00899644 487134.98
org.fdroid.fdroid.privileged 15u8aAPK4jJ5N8wpWJ5gutAyyeHtKX5i18 52.00899644 487134.98
org.fdroid.fdroid.ota 15u8aAPK4jJ5N8wpWJ5gutAyyeHtKX5i18 52.00899644 487134.98
org.fdroid.fdroid 15u8aAPK4jJ5N8wpWJ5gutAyyeHtKX5i18 52.00899644 487134.98
org.fdroid.basic 15u8aAPK4jJ5N8wpWJ5gutAyyeHtKX5i18 52.00899644 487134.98
de.k3b.android.lossless_jpg_crop 15u8aAPK4jJ5N8wpWJ5gutAyyeHtKX5i18 52.00899644 487134.98
org.calyxinstitute.vpn 14wntQ8cBdnhUVfYmDjXz6PbpSSX8nCtkr 17.65221369 165336.99
de.tutao.tutanota 3MDrR5gaMvL8sphuQLX6BvPPKYNArdXsv6 10.30485934 96519.02
net.osmand.plus 1GRgEnKujorJJ9VBa76g8cp3sfoWtQqSs4 8.49212217 79540.27
me.tripsit.tripmobile 1EDqf32gw73tc1WtgdT2FymfmDN4RyC9RN 7.00970601 65655.43
player.efis.pfd 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91
player.efis.mfd 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91
player.efis.data.zar.aus 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91
player.efis.data.usa.can 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91
player.efis.data.sah.jap 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91
player.efis.data.pan.arg 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91
player.efis.data.eur.rus 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91
player.efis.cfd 1KKWRF25NwVgNdankr1vBphtkLbX766Ee1 5.0014 46844.91
com.nutomic.zertman 1NUqm2kyaiRdssFaxYd7CQaWy4og19xH5g 5.0 46831.80
com.nutomic.ensichat 1DmU6QVGSKXGXJU1bqmmStPDNsNnYoMJB4 4.99995 46831.33
com.brentpanther.litecoinwidget 15SHnY7HC5bTxzErHDPe7wHXj1HhtDKV7z 4.29288259 40208.68
com.brentpanther.ethereumwidget 15SHnY7HC5bTxzErHDPe7wHXj1HhtDKV7z 4.29288259 40208.68
com.brentpanther.bitcoinwidget 15SHnY7HC5bTxzErHDPe7wHXj1HhtDKV7z 4.29288259 40208.68
com.brentpanther.bitcoincashwidget 15SHnY7HC5bTxzErHDPe7wHXj1HhtDKV7z 4.29288259 40208.68
im.vector.alpha 1LxowEgsquZ3UPZ68wHf8v2MDZw82dVmAE 3.65680571 34250.96
in.p1x.tanks_of_freedom 18oHovhxpevALZFcjH3mgNKB1yLi3nNFRY 3.59251169 33648.76
com.veken0m.bitcoinium 1yjDmiukhB2i1XyVw5t7hpAK4WXo32d54 3.49440553 32729.86
com.vuze.android.remote 15j7vKgJbixQFZ6AvEFw2BhtA4KG7E14JZ 2.52566983 23656.33
at.bitfire.nophonespam 1KSCy7RHztKuhW9fLLaUYqdwdC2iwbejZU 2.40361077 22513.08
at.bitfire.icsdroid 1KSCy7RHztKuhW9fLLaUYqdwdC2iwbejZU 2.40361077 22513.08
at.bitfire.gfxtablet 1KSCy7RHztKuhW9fLLaUYqdwdC2iwbejZU 2.40361077 22513.08
at.bitfire.davdroid 1KSCy7RHztKuhW9fLLaUYqdwdC2iwbejZU 2.40361077 22513.08
at.bitfire.cadroid 1KSCy7RHztKuhW9fLLaUYqdwdC2iwbejZU 2.40361077 22513.08
com.wireguard.android 1ASnTs4UjXKR8tHnLi9yG42n42hbFYV2um 2.36196229 22122.99
net.sourceforge.wifiremoteplay 1LKCFto9SQGqtcvqZxHkqDPqNjSnfMmsow 2.20225896 20627.15
net.sourceforge.opencamera 1LKCFto9SQGqtcvqZxHkqDPqNjSnfMmsow 2.20225896 20627.15
org.witness.sscphase1 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
org.torproject.android 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
org.havenapp.main 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.ripple 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.pixelknot 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.otr.app.im 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.orfox 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.notepadbot 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.locationprivacy 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.lildebi 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.gilga 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.courier 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.checkey 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.cacert 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
info.guardianproject.browser 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
at.or.at.plugoffairplane 1Fi5xUHiAPRKxHvyUGVFGt9extBe8Srdbk 2.00473917 18777.11
sk.baka.aedict 1KJyEutxrm3yL7chvsciMJTvXahXoWE3Pw 2.0 18732.72
byrne.utilities.pasteedroid 1L44pgmZpeMsWsd24WgN6SJjEUARG5eY6G 1.93771879 18149.37
byrne.utilities.hashpass 1L44pgmZpeMsWsd24WgN6SJjEUARG5eY6G 1.93771879 18149.37
byrne.utilities.converter 1L44pgmZpeMsWsd24WgN6SJjEUARG5eY6G 1.93771879 18149.37
com.zoffcc.applications.zanavi 1ZANav18WY8ytM7bhnAEBS3bdrTohsD9p 1.3792561 12918.61
eu.domob.shopt 1domobKsPZ5cWk2kXssD8p8ES1qffGUCm 1.30931 12263.47
eu.domob.bjtrainer 1domobKsPZ5cWk2kXssD8p8ES1qffGUCm 1.30931 12263.47
eu.domob.angulo 1domobKsPZ5cWk2kXssD8p8ES1qffGUCm 1.30931 12263.47
eu.domob.anacam 1domobKsPZ5cWk2kXssD8p8ES1qffGUCm 1.30931 12263.47
libretasks.app 193Xb3sySr2oEMuJC6bqAov444rSyVczW 1.24689782 11678.89
com.ymber.eleven 12aDckQC6YHEn75zReQWxXFCivBBNXfRjM 1.19375821 11181.17
si.modrajagoda.didi 1FU27EyocpFFhexjoakSe7Hxvf4jD2KmFh 1.05 9834.68
com.nononsenseapps.feeder 1PdmeeGxB2iktvmtkGqwUNmYq7L9tnxjwE 1.02972708 9644.79
org.projectmaxs.transport.xmpp bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.wifichange bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.wifiaccess bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.smswrite bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.smssend bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.smsread bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.smsnotify bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.shell bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.ringermode bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.phonestateread bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.notification bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.nfc bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.misc bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.locationfine bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.filewrite bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.fileread bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.contactsread bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.clipboard bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.bluetoothadmin bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.bluetooth bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.module.alarmset bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
org.projectmaxs.main bc1qu482c0tngkcvx3q7mrm8zmuldrh2f2lrh26ym0 0.9995 9361.68
com.eibriel.reddot 1MD8wCtnx5zqGvkY1VYPNqckAyTWDhXKzY 0.923361 8648.53
org.briarproject.briar.android 1NZCKkUCtJV2U2Y9hDb9uq8S7ksFCFGR6K 0.59356774 5559.57
eu.faircode.email 13nUbfsLUzK9Sr7ZJgDRHNR91BJMuDuJnf 0.51806696 4852.40
de.robv.android.xposed.installer 1uAEzZrfJt96UHYQheUUC8gSp2TJdwdw3 0.49531493 4639.30
org.kontalk 14vipppSvCG7VdvoYmbhKZ8DbTfv9U1QfS 0.48859802 4576.38
hashengineering.groestlcoin.wallet_test 3BCeMXVny1HbDc4NK64UZs9oFjKZdajBfx 0.48 4495.85
hashengineering.groestlcoin.wallet 3BCeMXVny1HbDc4NK64UZs9oFjKZdajBfx 0.48 4495.85
org.disrupted.rumble 1PXXMinxQgYUPXzZq6BixZpJTFeiCLqDqD 0.44804797 4196.58
se.manyver 3NNGfHL96UrjggaBVQojF1mnGnXNx1SXv7 0.44135235 4133.86
org.schabi.sharewithnewpipe 16A9J59ahMRqkLSZjhYj33n9j3fMztFxnh 0.40426632 3786.50
org.schabi.openhitboxstreams 16A9J59ahMRqkLSZjhYj33n9j3fMztFxnh 0.40426632 3786.50
org.schabi.newpipelegacy 16A9J59ahMRqkLSZjhYj33n9j3fMztFxnh 0.40426632 3786.50
org.schabi.newpipe 16A9J59ahMRqkLSZjhYj33n9j3fMztFxnh 0.40426632 3786.50
org.mariotaku.twidere 1FHAVAzge7cj1LfCTMfnLL49DgA3mVUCuW 0.33555159 3142.90
de.gabbo.forro_lyrics 1MDjHkXQud77UJk6TqmGkjeyhmz67NfE6g 0.32967373 3087.84
org.disroot.disrootapp 1GNmDSXxpU1zaxEopKCJK2TzLh3dbZAxEA 0.32853919 3077.22
com.dfa.hubzilla_android 1GNmDSXxpU1zaxEopKCJK2TzLh3dbZAxEA 0.32853919 3077.22
com.watabou.pixeldungeon 1LyLJAzxCfieivap1yK3iCpGoUmzAnjdyK 0.30544626 2860.92
ca.pr0ps.xposed.entrustunblocker 15jv7w1AdCMkNpDaAQrPtwK3Lfxx5ggAKX 0.2981067 2792.17
ca.cmetcalfe.xposed.flatconnectivityicons 15jv7w1AdCMkNpDaAQrPtwK3Lfxx5ggAKX 0.2981067 2792.17
ca.cmetcalfe.xposed.disablebatterywarnings 15jv7w1AdCMkNpDaAQrPtwK3Lfxx5ggAKX 0.2981067 2792.17
ca.cmetcalfe.locationshare 15jv7w1AdCMkNpDaAQrPtwK3Lfxx5ggAKX 0.2981067 2792.17
eu.faircode.netguard 13vtPytVVqCwojmohAqsK61Tk4yGXSWpJK 0.28845628 2701.79
org.totschnig.myexpenses 1GCUGCSfFXzSC81ogHu12KxfUn3cShekMn 0.26904759 2520.00
com.termux.window 1BXS5qPhJzhr5iK5nmNDSmoLDfB6VmN5hv 0.2645677 2478.04
com.termux.widget 1BXS5qPhJzhr5iK5nmNDSmoLDfB6VmN5hv 0.2645677 2478.04
com.termux.tasker 1BXS5qPhJzhr5iK5nmNDSmoLDfB6VmN5hv 0.2645677 2478.04
com.termux.styling 1BXS5qPhJzhr5iK5nmNDSmoLDfB6VmN5hv 0.2645677 2478.04
com.termux.boot 1BXS5qPhJzhr5iK5nmNDSmoLDfB6VmN5hv 0.2645677 2478.04
com.termux.api 1BXS5qPhJzhr5iK5nmNDSmoLDfB6VmN5hv 0.2645677 2478.04
com.termux 1BXS5qPhJzhr5iK5nmNDSmoLDfB6VmN5hv 0.2645677 2478.04
se.leap.riseupvpn 1F3KowUJBfvocr1H6DRvwFxfETJ18e8Dp6 0.25404247 2379.45
eu.siacs.conversations.voicerecorder 1AeqNAcg85APAZj9BZfAjdFCC5zesqXp2B 0.25226604 2362.81
eu.siacs.conversations.legacy 1AeqNAcg85APAZj9BZfAjdFCC5zesqXp2B 0.25226604 2362.81
com.morphoss.acal 1C7ChLNbwiQNWS6BLCPNU5TzX3ve7Xup2m 0.24548194 2299.27
com.b44t.messenger 18e3zwis2raitdZVhEhHHT7xG6oXsZte9L 0.24530249 2297.59
com.achep.acdisplay 1GYj49ZnMByKj2f6p7r4f92GQi5pR6BSMz 0.23828669 2231.88
net.alegen.android.netclip 1862EpKxs4BGUM6Td2Gs83QCkVC889Eqja 0.23149008 2168.22
com.simplemobiletools.voicerecorder 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.thankyou 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.smsmessenger 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.notes.pro 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.notes 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.musicplayer 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.gallery.pro 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.gallery 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.flashlight 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.filemanager.pro 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.filemanager 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.draw.pro 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.draw 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.dialer 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.contacts.pro 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.contacts 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.clock 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.camera 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.calendar.pro 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.calendar 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.calculator 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
com.simplemobiletools.applauncher 19Hc8A7sWGud8sP19VXDC5a5j28UyJfpyJ 0.20711972 1939.96
cx.hell.android.pdfviewpro 1MLdh6uAPymWVJ4bmRde684uTcLJWwumkK 0.20361036 1907.09
cx.hell.android.pdfview 1MLdh6uAPymWVJ4bmRde684uTcLJWwumkK 0.20361036 1907.09
de.grobox.liberario 12JaQp8zfqRb83JfSwVjH4rZWsZnWRPoyG 0.18405547 1723.93
de.grobox.blitzmail 12JaQp8zfqRb83JfSwVjH4rZWsZnWRPoyG 0.18405547 1723.93
com.todobom.opennotescanner 1H5tqKZoWdqkR54PGe9w67EzBnLXHBFmt9 0.16962324 1588.75
org.libreoffice.impressremote 129jj3HiLfj3zCfqoro3sMTdovizXEdo8A 0.16380002 1534.21
org.eu.exodus_privacy.exodusprivacy 1exodusdyqXD81tS8SkcLhyFj9ioxWsaZ 0.15745937 1474.82
org.openintents.shopping 16MJeiftw9LRuvqoSH18v16kYTeNx7wJSZ 0.1507208 1411.71
org.openintents.safe 16MJeiftw9LRuvqoSH18v16kYTeNx7wJSZ 0.1507208 1411.71
org.openintents.notepad 16MJeiftw9LRuvqoSH18v16kYTeNx7wJSZ 0.1507208 1411.71
org.openintents.flashlight 16MJeiftw9LRuvqoSH18v16kYTeNx7wJSZ 0.1507208 1411.71
org.openintents.filemanager 16MJeiftw9LRuvqoSH18v16kYTeNx7wJSZ 0.1507208 1411.71
de.smasi.tickmate 18tub3juj26zyGwdpmGDLgtLEpfFf2Nvhu 0.14452004 1353.63
me.hda.urlhda 1N5czHaoSLukFSTq2ZJujaWGjkmBxv2dT9 0.142 1330.02
com.passcard 1N5czHaoSLukFSTq2ZJujaWGjkmBxv2dT9 0.142 1330.02
org.blokada.alarm 16rJ49uNKCohVhHvWNganP6Y48Ba9BTyKd 0.14151834 1325.51
org.floens.chan 1N7VtcNh8L8u4tF9CJ38GjnPbmxM4Vixi6 0.13177915 1234.29
press.condense.www 325oe18pc8npqHeBGozobnvWfXXe3pujXq 0.12791726 1198.12
org.quantumbadger.redreader 1874wapGxDo2vEp4avisda4gx3SCjsHCQJ 0.12570044 1177.36
wb.receiptspro 3MGikseSB69cGjUkJs4Cqg93s5s8tv38tK 0.12023971 1126.21
be.brunoparmentier.wifikeyshare 168utA5DWMVXLFVfQDahG5abEWUSk9Wcfm 0.11048893 1034.88
be.brunoparmentier.openbikesharing.app 168utA5DWMVXLFVfQDahG5abEWUSk9Wcfm 0.11048893 1034.88
be.brunoparmentier.dnssetter 168utA5DWMVXLFVfQDahG5abEWUSk9Wcfm 0.11048893 1034.88
be.brunoparmentier.apkshare 168utA5DWMVXLFVfQDahG5abEWUSk9Wcfm 0.11048893 1034.88
org.smssecure.smssecure 1LoKZXg3bx6kfwAhEFQqS9pgeCE1CFMEJb 0.10927359 1023.50
mobi.boilr.boilr 1PHuSWfuAwR6oz9qV93rTdMVozfM85Qqxx 0.101 946.00
com.morlunk.mountie 1ySD4UzFDtPLq9agRg9eiFtWmz6DJ7bBf 0.09228972 864.42
org.lf_net.pgpunlocker 18ii4wvKxPFvKoGk7MXLngq9yWNsp7ABPd 0.08827862 826.85
com.orpheusdroid.sqliteviewer 1Cbf61y8XNx3BLWvoZB71x4XgBKB7r8BuB 0.07990648 748.43
com.orpheusdroid.screenrecorder 1Cbf61y8XNx3BLWvoZB71x4XgBKB7r8BuB 0.07990648 748.43
com.biglybt.android.client 1BiGLYBT38ttJhvZkjGc5mCw5uKoRHcUmr 0.06538094 612.38
net.gsantner.markor 1B9ZyYdQoY9BxMe9dRUEKaZbJWsbQqfXU5 0.06195393 580.28
net.gsantner.dandelior 1B9ZyYdQoY9BxMe9dRUEKaZbJWsbQqfXU5 0.06195393 580.28
io.github.gsantner.memetastic 1B9ZyYdQoY9BxMe9dRUEKaZbJWsbQqfXU5 0.06195393 580.28
io.github.froodyapp 1B9ZyYdQoY9BxMe9dRUEKaZbJWsbQqfXU5 0.06195393 580.28
de.live.gdev.timetracker 1B9ZyYdQoY9BxMe9dRUEKaZbJWsbQqfXU5 0.06195393 580.28
de.live.gdev.cherrymusic 1B9ZyYdQoY9BxMe9dRUEKaZbJWsbQqfXU5 0.06195393 580.28
com.github.dfa.diaspora_android 1B9ZyYdQoY9BxMe9dRUEKaZbJWsbQqfXU5 0.06195393 580.28
org.woltage.irssiconnectbot 12Xe9L8Kam2F838RipTstT1BAxWLZjWRxh 0.05900001 552.62
dev.ukanth.ufirewall 1LBUdALwYXDv38wvnUSGvsFjituaWAHvFo 0.05663316 530.45
org.totschnig.sendwithftp 1Dmj6keLGgNHBUD5unsbZz5vnk9wRinRAy 0.05247253 491.48
com.github.yeriomin.yalpstore 14HvYHKe6joHbQjVdAPd1Ha1yXaGS2pVTW 0.05018261 470.03
com.github.yeriomin.smsscheduler 14HvYHKe6joHbQjVdAPd1Ha1yXaGS2pVTW 0.05018261 470.03
com.github.yeriomin.dumbphoneassistant 14HvYHKe6joHbQjVdAPd1Ha1yXaGS2pVTW 0.05018261 470.03
org.ethack.orwall 1Kriu9owRhEsFkj8Lc6Wr5xTv8YTNphhXn 0.04385552 410.77
org.indywidualni.fblite 1JUaZytkub2CP5jhRYQDDY6pibqrUUSp2y 0.04214968 394.79
com.anthony.deepl.openl 3DetrDfft3ChjXMQUsTwQL1ozQvBXwGSsQ 0.04 374.65
org.jamienicol.episodes 149XkMSs84ZyzNMqiQeJLt5DbPru16amwA 0.033 309.09
io.github.powerinside.syncplay 16E1hn96zg9h16VCrxSG6p7b72vyNh64ft 0.03048045 285.49
io.github.powerinside.scrollsocket 16E1hn96zg9h16VCrxSG6p7b72vyNh64ft 0.03048045 285.49
nya.miku.wishmaster 1LaumSD5Y9npHxsq9Cqo3esmWiytqv95QW 0.03 280.99
am.ed.importcontacts 14FPuKQfmV31Fx4uxwXvehmM189nxaQpKB 0.02695857 252.50
am.ed.exportcontacts 14FPuKQfmV31Fx4uxwXvehmM189nxaQpKB 0.02695857 252.50
org.tasks 136mW34jW3cmZKhxuTDn3tHXMRwbbaRU8s 0.02141326 200.56
com.moonpi.tapunlock 1NZGAU1rEs1zBpwdjmnBjiyRsJHfycWhSF 0.02106 197.26
com.moonpi.swiftnotes 1NZGAU1rEs1zBpwdjmnBjiyRsJHfycWhSF 0.02106 197.26
org.telegram.messenger 1McafEgMvqAVujNLtcJumZHxp2UfaNByqs 0.02006732 187.96
eu.faircode.xlua 1GePXhRPgLhwQmBwRHhX1nSCgvfnCY97Gg 0.01687755 158.08
org.decsync.sparss.floss 1JWYoV2MZyu8LYYHCur9jUJgGqE98m566z 0.01598957 149.76
org.decsync.cc 1JWYoV2MZyu8LYYHCur9jUJgGqE98m566z 0.01598957 149.76
org.asdtm.goodweather 1FV8m1MKqZ9ZKB8YNwpsjsuubHTznJSiT8 0.01510861 141.51
org.asdtm.fas 1FV8m1MKqZ9ZKB8YNwpsjsuubHTznJSiT8 0.01510861 141.51
com.nma.util.sdcardtrac 16bxTv1fP8X2QN5SWXc1AcKhhA1tJQKcTa 0.015 140.50
com.kunzisoft.keyboard.switcher 1DSwXCk7Sob24sNsofywNoRQw2f5Qj5t2F 0.01473243 137.99
com.kunzisoft.keepass.libre 1DSwXCk7Sob24sNsofywNoRQw2f5Qj5t2F 0.01473243 137.99
fr.kwiatkowski.ApkTrack 19wFVDUWhrjRe3rPCsokhcf1w9Stj3Sr6K 0.01440284 134.90
com.stripe1.xmouse 17DaqbcEEG3Hn5jBv3sRjPTUUCW1eBp1Wg 0.01358135 127.21
org.nutritionfacts.dailydozen 3GQUrb9sw36MoQeZNJ4g16CCNqgr3Va6bx 0.0118 110.52
com.stoutner.privacybrowser.standard 1Jiooc5L238VnhiWtkdYEkwm7kRNWQspSC 0.01159484 108.60
org.sufficientlysecure.termbot 1LY6Hs6SurATjfxnihzLMDUMUuMxvQ4aEi 0.01151042 107.81
org.sufficientlysecure.keychain 1LY6Hs6SurATjfxnihzLMDUMUuMxvQ4aEi 0.01151042 107.81
com.zeapo.pwdstore 1H1Z1NPTrR5Cej9bKV3Hu4f5WJZYtkbpox 0.01141762 106.94
pk.contender.earmouse 1FdwmPaKhE6pmPRxNHcWh3yFDo3mdtMPy 0.01041024 97.51
im.quicksy.client 3KAD8vew6tPZDjiUJNnZ3YUoUxrCEVNwFL 0.01024848 95.99
eu.siacs.conversations 3KAD8vew6tPZDjiUJNnZ3YUoUxrCEVNwFL 0.01024848 95.99
org.hoi_polloi.android.ringcode 18FLvxn8Vgz5DTgVH1kT4DRJoaANpWhqvP 0.01 93.66
at.linuxtage.companion 1GLTBBirbj8GZ8uY1gwovZ1QEMjfWu3rWT 0.01 93.66
com.jarsilio.android.waveup 16DXeCxxKGvepYLehyHSr3M1nv1s1eUotZ 0.00789495 73.95
com.jarsilio.android.scrambledeggsif 16DXeCxxKGvepYLehyHSr3M1nv1s1eUotZ 0.00789495 73.95
com.jarsilio.android.pocketup 16DXeCxxKGvepYLehyHSr3M1nv1s1eUotZ 0.00789495 73.95
com.jarsilio.android.drowser 16DXeCxxKGvepYLehyHSr3M1nv1s1eUotZ 0.00789495 73.95
se.leap.bitmaskclient 1Fze6GLjoxFnwAGNreYLK8ktFdGJdPRxeY 0.00763591 71.52
com.saha.batchuninstaller 3GRYNKRUFsefuvKuTycgbMjB4DFxUXVys4 0.007 65.56
org.sufficientlysecure.viewer.fontpack 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.sufficientlysecure.viewer 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.sufficientlysecure.standalonecalendar 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.sufficientlysecure.localcalendar 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.sufficientlysecure.ical 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.shortcuts 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.ntpsync 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.fastergps 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
org.birthdayadapter 12Y6zbBYoRxf8kBrjau3WedjtzvcACvPMk 0.00666289 62.41
com.moez.QKSMS 3ELLdraJTuJB2CtQACZiAuf1X3udeAsRgP 0.00403494 37.79
org.xposeddownloader 16VEzu37BePgR3o9hAciZkGK2VCAQFE28r 0.0035 32.78
org.opengappsdownloader 16VEzu37BePgR3o9hAciZkGK2VCAQFE28r 0.0035 32.78
org.basketbuilddownloader 16VEzu37BePgR3o9hAciZkGK2VCAQFE28r 0.0035 32.78
org.afhdownloader 16VEzu37BePgR3o9hAciZkGK2VCAQFE28r 0.0035 32.78
com.gianlu.aria2app 18rrPNGgz8UkzUYgAnqVye83xEe5fB7XfY 0.00330638 30.97
com.gianlu.aria2android 18rrPNGgz8UkzUYgAnqVye83xEe5fB7XfY 0.00330638 30.97
com.oriondev.moneywallet 1J3APoaFT2jcqRzpb8bEt2rwUn3mDpWE5U 0.00290149 27.18
com.omegavesko.holocounter 19J43UNjckM9Q2M59ZM8ptCW5kA1dWdHdp 0.00277121 25.96
ir.hsn6.turo 1PUJ5sFWxvbx5Np2CjFmhHFnzPe2GPvinj 0.00271154 25.40
com.fr3ts0n.stagefever 19UApzsc5eDJ5VNDNYCA1bpszPnkcpWeFP 0.00235526 22.06
com.fr3ts0n.ecu.gui.androbd 19UApzsc5eDJ5VNDNYCA1bpszPnkcpWeFP 0.00235526 22.06
com.fr3ts0n.androbd.plugin.sensorprovider 19UApzsc5eDJ5VNDNYCA1bpszPnkcpWeFP 0.00235526 22.06
com.fr3ts0n.androbd.plugin.mqtt 19UApzsc5eDJ5VNDNYCA1bpszPnkcpWeFP 0.00235526 22.06
com.fr3ts0n.androbd.plugin.gpsprovider 19UApzsc5eDJ5VNDNYCA1bpszPnkcpWeFP 0.00235526 22.06
de.tadris.fitness 3BSbGRbJaiSxVg3D6nVRK5C1SZEezhjtK5 0.00214369 20.08
eu.uwot.fabio.altcoinprices 353x3kNMUaAt3i79kQTf3KCJWRAVXSRGpW 0.00213 19.95
ch.bailu.aat 3GK4KLiqKqGg5UQxdkkGXhhDZkdFFicy5T 0.002 18.73
org.elijaxapps.androidxmrigminer 37GpugVZNiof2DzWQX5aivHewc4wZLxATL 0.00189005 17.70
io.oversec.one 16tan5fBNJ6n1QmVxwvvondyvuwgx1W6fE 0.00177442 16.62
com.goltzkiste.guessaday 1Guessas8CtCA9S9ZA9p9fCFAD3VZTE9ey 0.00176227 16.51
net.khertan.forrunners 1s38rpyuJvfvcRFaESZmVSp6EYpVLEDWU 0.00134051 12.56
de.schildbach.oeffi bc1qxm9r8n3pe47r30e04gs2xsalxef55zrfvelvln 0.0012577 11.78
org.gdroid.gdroid 1J2bbhJYksSjeynGGhuSPN9aTEaxiGm4nR 0.001 9.37
com.gitlab.ardash.appleflinger.android 1J2bbhJYksSjeynGGhuSPN9aTEaxiGm4nR 0.001 9.37
org.zamedev.gloomydungeons2.opensource 1BkmsNEeW5A2YketBaa4pDFSAcDwnDuyDp 0.00099 9.27
net.fabiszewski.ulogger bc1qt3uwhze9x8tj6v73c587gprhufg9uur0rzxhvh 0.00097941 9.17
ir.hsn6.trans 1MkJyXh8y3ViXTAFhKUpXfgfECEfnZmLGY 0.00080184 7.51
net.frju.flym 3DprwFMg5bXGz8QimyiaoEE7mmCkj2DGf5 0.00068 6.37
com.zeusln.zeus 3Lbz4vdt15Fsa4wVD3Yk8uGf6ugKKY4zSc 0.0006 5.62
de.schildbach.wallet bc1qedxd9jssgw2fferdmjyyh6fm8jax75q7drfnd4 0.00059521 5.57
com.zoffcc.applications.trifa 1TRifA7eNLHZEcCTj43eYVWHBbLqTuXkS 0.00028782 2.70
com.notecryptpro 1MHEbHt4sBeqGoriwAq1MsXZaZJinoUeLH 0.00027552 2.58
ir.hsn6.defendo 16D7Nroenpx4QDNqfq3Js7sdAVhew2NzGp 0.00018749 1.76
org.proninyaroslav.libretorrent 1Af9DgxtWvVp6bFiYQw2MeWtRzTXshRYpB 0.0001747 1.64
me.shrimadhavuk.numselapp 13csS5SByVR4e3tJ9c4gjC18Lua8dXDp9A 0.00010397 0.97
com.wesaphzt.privatelock 1GCkvAg9oG79niQTbh6EH9rPALQDXKyHKK 5.773e-05 0.54
com.wesaphzt.privatelocation 1GCkvAg9oG79niQTbh6EH9rPALQDXKyHKK 5.773e-05 0.54
ru.glesik.nostrangersms 1DbZjPqe4uaBv32deNqwbWUTrCempo2Wqk 5e-05 0.47
ru.ttyh.neko259.notey 1Lh7a1tx7EREENawQyHhiKoCRF6u6TzVrD 0.0 0.00
re.jcg.playmusicexporter 1NdzpDWPQ53xWT5fraGPZX5F9XrKiPBXjp 0.0 0.00
pl.sanszo.pcis 1PbH84rewi34Ffgr3C5NutMdvEzSQ13wUt 0.0 0.00
pl.net.szafraniec.NFCTagmaker 17E32x5ygXkqf5EWJkryZuarUDUFrb8UqQ 0.0 0.00
pl.net.szafraniec.NFCKey 17E32x5ygXkqf5EWJkryZuarUDUFrb8UqQ 0.0 0.00
org.valos.isolmoa 1LbgYALbkQ2Trgh4yXqdBnbdQosGard5hd 0.0 0.00
org.thecongers.mtpms 1Pg54vVnaLxNsziA6cy9CTefoEG5iAm9Uh 0.0 0.00
org.pacien.tincapp 152t9TEBBhEescQx5gG7T5wHaJVeupAXQm 0.0 0.00
org.opengemara.shiurim 19p5TXDfMksHjUstFEp2PUt383Cy7JdmLa 0.0 0.00
org.nuntius35.wrongpinshutdown 1LSs1BR4ktQcW8DrCjrSrWUvBD6h2rqNJm 0.0 0.00
org.nick.wwwjdic 1DXhWFS9SL78GGyX7Luao9EuP5SxtDiPG1 0.0 0.00
org.miamplayer.autoairplanemode 39RBokXr4V9FPpuF7v1bM6PYcbgRRApp9W 0.0 0.00
org.mbach.lemonde 39RBokXr4V9FPpuF7v1bM6PYcbgRRApp9W 0.0 0.00
org.kost.nmap.android.networkmapper 1588ArbHPcb5VtpZPQgue9iPZ9LiA1eEjF 0.0 0.00
org.kost.externalip 1KbtLnxp6mhkGznFNZZQdcaCUQHmrTtLm4 0.0 0.00
org.kaqui 12bnT7epKmf9ztkAeuM8dHCcoc76r9rgVX 0.0 0.00
org.emunix.unipatcher 16coztryz7xbNNDNhhf98wuHmi3hEintsW 0.0 0.00
org.emunix.insteadlauncher 16coztryz7xbNNDNhhf98wuHmi3hEintsW 0.0 0.00
org.chickenhook.startflagexploit bc1qvll2mp5ndwd4sgycu4ad2ken4clhjac7mdlcaj 0.0 0.00
org.androidpn.client 13MjTPDFQtxv1u1sWURkDduFSw97KbMfsS 0.0 0.00
org.amoradi.syncopoli 1DT8ijBkGUAvW9VZqfCQBJFS62vvw5E7QK 0.0 0.00
net.schueller.peertube 1LoTXo728HzYTtyfbkaf5ewSRvu8ABTDPm 0.0 0.00
net.mabako.steamgifts 1NQBKppWPZiE5PshLxqfFW4pgsnAv9irEu 0.0 0.00
name.gdr.acastus_photon 1NjjuTxXm3ezpnVUGk4VmdEZUcym3SKZ8z 0.0 0.00
me.dbarnett.acastus 1NjjuTxXm3ezpnVUGk4VmdEZUcym3SKZ8z 0.0 0.00
me.danielbarnett.addresstogps 1NjjuTxXm3ezpnVUGk4VmdEZUcym3SKZ8z 0.0 0.00
it.reyboz.screenlock 16oHee3jeENnN6fPxFq6LpNP6SZG9rimRD 0.0 0.00
it.reyboz.minesweeper 16oHee3jeENnN6fPxFq6LpNP6SZG9rimRD 0.0 0.00
it.reyboz.chordshift 16oHee3jeENnN6fPxFq6LpNP6SZG9rimRD 0.0 0.00
it.reyboz.bustorino 16oHee3jeENnN6fPxFq6LpNP6SZG9rimRD 0.0 0.00
it.andreascarpino.hostisdown 1Ph3hFEoQaD4PK6MhL3kBNNh9FZFBfisEH 0.0 0.00
is.zi.huewidgets 1FdGg777eP4cqMrJVMRQiMXEHE2Ee6F62T 0.0 0.00
ir.hsn6.tpb 12SL5VgtjozKTXMgpX7w4MjKvvcFAHbTks 0.0 0.00
ir.hsn6.k2 1iNMJMFqDgYp7iUMd4qkP79CiCLSwLPyp 0.0 0.00
io.github.tjg1.nori 1NHUsSzj3N7TE8rykUYk8rqqLWWSmTVzdp 0.0 0.00
in.shick.lockpatterngenerator 1JscvZEbchRUpCXYX13bJb3aF6U1yT9BwG 0.0 0.00
ga.testapp.testapp 3NUiJXDCkyRTb9Tg7n63yK6Y7CexADtSEh 0.0 0.00
fr.renzo.wikipoff 1BAaxTvK1jkoFKf7qWF2C6M4UX1y86MxaF 0.0 0.00
fr.cph.chicago.foss 13WUmCX1AePEKFGv5U1qRgBockFahsm21o 0.0 0.00
fr.corenting.traficparis 3JmaEkuviReVdCG8fjqCs5LwQkaEGcTMtZ 0.0 0.00
eth.matteljay.mastermindy 14VZcizduTvUTesw4T9yAHZ7GjDDmXZmVs 0.0 0.00
design.codeux.authpass.fdroid 3NcBacCmJbYWpwxj6rWzpM7sx48etMrPtc 0.0 0.00
de.yaacc 1MUvbfNgunNCUtitCkoEEMgmQGZJJg4isj 0.0 0.00
de.vanitasvitae.enigmandroid 1EqhcKs1pZJhEmyCtbH3qtkHT3Y48MCoAT 0.0 0.00
de.schildbach.wallet_test bc1qglkj2svuu3xsktup5xla8u2wjzlu8mfzk6509r 0.0 0.00
de.naturalnet.zahnarztgeraeusche 1EAytSwn1u7tKTZ9sMDVCzDqe2nwVf4Pra 0.0 0.00
de.naturalnet.mirwtfapp 1EAytSwn1u7tKTZ9sMDVCzDqe2nwVf4Pra 0.0 0.00
de.k4ever.k4android 1KiwFPGCunGXF53DBTBf32cNTPXq9FbX5H 0.0 0.00
de.jkliemann.parkendd 1HBFDdz7dJeBE2c3zQmWnzeWCbHoZQ64dd 0.0 0.00
de.Cherubin7th.blackscreenpresentationremote 18QSJmV6Liia7Cau65JnEj2JyxEUCGE2oz 0.0 0.00
com.tritop.androsense2 1Dj4Xkz5KtsarmioEKuuZCBVjahr14dih4 0.0 0.00
com.toxtox.philosopherstonewidget 1KvYjRx1VozqUpiYSCMrEL6mo9LvmpCcNN 0.0 0.00
com.sanskritbasics.memory bc1q3xasvfn2c84dprkk2mxj5g7n6ujwylphu8qsf3 0.0 0.00
com.rockbyte.arxiv 1jokQaTneW1KCbCWsMdVtvPv6oSJ1H3tF 0.0 0.00
com.rigid.birthdroid 1BLEeqwXnJJbpaLHiskZ5WyJJRyEWqCAQZ 0.0 0.00
com.readrops.app bc1qlkzlcsvvtn3y6mek5umv5tc4ln09l64x6y42hr 0.0 0.00
com.onetwofivegames.kungfoobarracuda 1MVNsgRmLqgMoEoQu918ozFFiTaepF8Ti5 0.0 0.00
com.mdroid 18BqyV9mNbFLi5HNNnfUprnPJyJDFP59Xh 0.0 0.00
com.mareksebera.simpledilbert 1FpGN3kcZ3GQsaJgBa8rxGRJjBjJavu78g 0.0 0.00
com.marceljurtz.lifecounter 1HDdKd3uoxdvS8pBKKKxEkjoJqUuBiEjkL 0.0 0.00
com.llamacorp.equate 15KCzAPJvSJLUfjuTQgAgSiSwQu6uLiexC 0.0 0.00
com.kn.paper_foss_theme 1CYiRF6AncdNkxcWTRFf5Mxi7UaFhC3jFG 0.0 0.00
com.ideasfrombrain.search_based_launcher_v2 1NapZs8brWNifGk7QFemqTByczdBAAg9cA 0.0 0.00
com.gmail.anubhavdas54.whatsdeleted bc1qs50wst8x53ud5lr80wukhjcy6l7zpxf5mz5rtm 0.0 0.00
com.github.igrmk.smsq 32JdGEVP42WiVxsADa3Z65qn1xe2K7Yg3S 0.0 0.00
com.genonbeta.TrebleShot 1DBsq8aZjn54hnDYsRY7pTLb3HfsE1mSv8 0.0 0.00
com.example.root.analyticaltranslator 15WVb3LZWCsdZGjkNFBuELwt3U4zpnSgwa 0.0 0.00
com.emmanuelmess.simpleaccounting 1HFhPxH9bqMKvs44nHqXjEEPC2m7z1V8tW 0.0 0.00
com.easwareapps.marbleone_ad_free 1PNwD199whFao1rjMX82Zi5A7M5B6KB7be 0.0 0.00
com.easwareapps.g2l 1PNwD199whFao1rjMX82Zi5A7M5B6KB7be 0.0 0.00
com.easwareapps.f2lflap2lock_adfree 1PNwD199whFao1rjMX82Zi5A7M5B6KB7be 0.0 0.00
com.danhasting.radar 1EwgjPGYiChJ5vyBndt9ugzd963FiVc6gj 0.0 0.00
com.atop 15G2T13emQnJRMvA74Zr6Q71bBcaYBn71v 0.0 0.00
com.aptasystems.dicewarepasswordgenerator 1PbHGv88KH6SXw6d66uSFTUzW2aeqxvQ7V 0.0 0.00
com.andreasgift.totalzero 1Q9TinY9kWoNMWuiToHiGC9uxCk6Vd41Gb 0.0 0.00
com.anddevw.getchromium 188RxvRnSXSZZnjuDdLwNirHDfNusVPobh 0.0 0.00
at.tacticaldevc.panictrigger 1EVr5tm2kugffNy3RWPGFoug6X9v3GTxuJ 0.0 0.00
im.vector.riotx 1LxowEgsquZ3UPZ68wHf8v2MDZw82dVmAEa -1.0 -9366.36
im.vector.app 1LxowEgsquZ3UPZ68wHf8v2MDZw82dVmAEa -1.0 -9366.36
I know this is flawed, I found it interesting nonetheless
The post which inspired this: https://www.reddit.com/fossdroid/comments/hyral2/are_there_fossdroid_apps_that_are_making_money/
submitted by prcrst to fossdroid [link] [comments]

[OC] If the regular season ended today, who would make your All-NBA 1st team? And 2nd team? And 3rd team? And 4th team? And 5th team? And 6th team? And 7th -- uh oh -- I think I lost my marbles... but let's keep going... 8th team? 9th team? 10th team?

Getting named as an NBA All-Star is a high honor, but being named to an All-NBA team is even rarer air. After all, only 15 players in the entire league earn that distinction. The fact that it's such an exclusive club makes it so important, so the idea of adding more players to the list would devalue it by nature. It'd be a silly, fruitless exercise, and a complete waste of time.
That said... it sure beats "reality" right now. And in the interest of escapism, let's entertain that hypothetical. Who would make your 1st team All-NBA? Your 2nd? Your 3rd? Your 4th? The challenge is get all the way up to the 10th if you can handle that test of your sanity.
For my own, I include a few caveats:
--- The NBA breaks down All-NBA spots more traditionally with frontcourt and backcourt, but I find that outdated. For mine, I'm going to include 1 "lead guard," 2 "wings," 1 "big," and 1 "flex" that can be any position. To me, that's reflective of the modern game. Most teams play with 1 guard, 3 wings, and 1 big, but there are teams that use 2 lead guards, or 2 bigs, etc.
--- The nature of basketball statistics tends to break down by game, or by minute, or even by play/possession. In the process, we tend to overlook players who are durable and add aggravate value over the course of a season. Personally, I'm going to factor in "games played" more than most would.
--- The advanced stats I'm listing are true shooting percentage and ESPN's estimated "wins added" based on their real plus/minus metric.
With all that said, let's get to the madness.
1st TEAM
GUARD: James Harden (HOU). 34.4 points, 7.4 assists, 62 TS%, +10.4 wins added
You can tell when a player has reached an historic level of greatness when no one seems to care when they're averaging over 34 points per game (on awesome efficiency.) Ho hum.
WING: LeBron James (LAL). 25.7 points, 10.6 assists, 58 TS%, +11.0 wins added
After last year's disappointment, LeBron James has come back leaner and meaner, with much better effort on D. He hasn't been attacking the paint and drawing fouls quite as well as he did in his youth, but he's adjusted his playing style and racked up a career high in assists.
WING: Giannis Antetounkmpo (MIL). 29.6 points, 13.7 rebounds, 61 TS%, +11.2 wins added
The Greek Freak's struggles at the free throw line (down to 63%) have lowered his efficiency from last year, but he's still clearly in contention for another MVP season. His point total nearly matches his minutes (30.9).
BIG: Nikola Jokic (DEN). 20.2 points, 6.9 assists, 60 TS%, +6.0 wins added
The Joker LOOKS like he should be a complete liability on defense, but the stats haven't born that out (he's +1.8 on that end in RPM.) And given that, his transcendent passing ability assists (get it???) his 1st team candidacy.
FLEX: Anthony Davis (LAL). 26.7 points, 2.4 blocks, 61 TS%, +5.2 wins added
The Lakers have vaulted into the top 3 in defense, largely due to Anthony Davis' ability to wreak havoc on that end. And keep in mind, he's leading his team in PPG as well.
2nd TEAM
GUARD: Damian Lillard (POR). 28.9 points, 7.8 assists, 62 TS%, +4.9 wins added
If it wasn't for Steph Curry and James Harden, Dame would be looking at a lot more first-team All-NBA seasons. This hasn't been Portland's best by any stretch, but it's hard to fault him for that.
WING: Luka Doncic (DAL). 28.7 points, 8.7 assists, 58 TS%, +5.9 wins added
No doubt, Luka Doncic is our toughest exclusion from the 1st team and the one I figure will be the most unpopular pick (so far.) The reason he slipped off the 1st team for me is the injury; he's played 10 less games than Nikola Jokic.
WING: Kawhi Leonard (LAC). 26.9 points, 5.0 assists, 59 TS%, +5.7 wins added
Similarly, it's always going to be tough for me to justify Kawhi on a 1st team as long as he takes off games (he's missed 13/64 so far.) Still, he should be rested and ready to go for another title campaign.
BIG: Rudy Gobert (UTA). 15.1 points, 13.7 rebounds, 70 TS%, +4.5 wins added
I wonder if Rudy Gobert's coronavirus issues will hurt him in media votes in the future. Personally, I'm just going to keep rewarding him and recognizing him as one of the most impactful players in the league.
FLEX: Jimmy Butler (MIA). 20.2 points, 6.1 assists, 58 TS%, +4.1 wins added
Jimmy Butler's struggled to score from the field this year, but his ability to draw contact and get to the line (9.1 FTA) keeps his efficiency above average. And therein, his passing and defense help boost him into this range.
3rd TEAM
GUARD: Chris Paul (OKC). 17.7 points, 6.8 assists, 61 TS%, +5.5 wins added
An incredible year all around for CP3, who has turned 35 years old this month.
WING: Jayson Tatum (BOS). 23.6 points, 7.1 rebounds, 56 TS%, +4.6 wins added
We all know him as a deadly scorer, but Jayson Tatum's added strength has helped him hang at the 4 spot on defense, which is a boon for the Celtics' small-ball/wing-ball approach.
WING: Khris Middleton (MIL). 21.1 points, 6.2 rebounds, 62 TS%, +3.7 wins added
Giannis is the engine that drives the Bucks, but having shooters like Middleton around him is key.
BIG: Pascal Siakam (TOR). 23.6 points, 3.6 assists, 56 TS%, +4.8 wins added
Without Kawhi Leonard soaking up attention, Pascal Siakam's not getting as many easy baskets (his 2-point FG% has dropped from 60.2% to 50.6%.) Still, he's a hugely valuable player on both ends of the floor. Is he a true “big?” No. But I think that term is broad enough to extend past centers and can include PFs as well for our purposes.
FLEX: Russell Westbrook (HOU). 27.5 points, 8.0 rebounds, 54 TS%, +6.0 wins added
I've never been a big Westbrook fan, but I give him credit for keeping his activity level and productivity up in a new role. He's gotten better and better as the season has gone on as well.
4th TEAM
GUARD: Ben Simmons (PHI). 16.7 points, 8.2 assists, 61 TS%, +4.2 wins added
Shooting? Still a problem. But fortunately, Ben Simmons does virtually everything else well. He can also step up his game when needed (like when Embiid is out.)
WING: Donovan Mitchell (UTA). 24.2 points, 4.2 assists, 56 TS%, +2.1 wins added
I don't know if Donovan Mitchell is truly any better than any high-scoring SGs like Devin Booker or Zach LaVine, but we have to reward him from being on a winner.
WING: Brandon Ingram (NO). 24.3 points, 6.3 rebounds, 59 TS%, +2.4 wins added
A candidate for Most Improved, Brandon Ingram helped carry his team early in the season. He'll still have to figure out his chemistry with Zion Williamson, but it's safe to say he made himself a lot of money this year.
BIG: Bam Adebayo (MIA). 16.2 points, 10.5 rebounds, 61 TS%, +3.1 wins added
Bam's ability to move the ball on offense (5+ assists) and move his feet on defense is key to the team. The scary part is: he may have another level to his game to reach.
FLEX: Devin Booker (PHX). 26.1 points, 6.6 assists, 62 TS%, +3.5 wins added
It's getting hard to blame Devin Booker for Phoenix's W-L record. He's just a flat-out stud scorer.
5th TEAM
GUARD: Trae Young (ATL). 29.6 points, 9.3 assists, 60 TS%, +3.2 wins added
Like Devin Booker, Trae Young is an offensive savant. Unfortunately, his defense is even more of an issue. He graded at -3.1 in RPM on that end, one of the worst in the entire NBA.
WING: Bradley Beal (WAS). 30.5 points, 6.1 assists, 58 TS%, +1.8 wins added
You expect Trae Young to be bad at defense, but Bradley Beal has graded surprisingly bad there as well (-2.8 RPM.) Of course, starting alongside Isaiah Thomas doesn't make that easy. Nevertheless, we had to downgrade him a few spots for the inconsistent effort there.
WING: Jaylen Brown (BOS). 20.4 points, 6.4 rebounds, 59 TS%, +3.3 wins added
Coming out of Cal, some scouts questions Jaylen Brown's feel for the game. Right now, it's hard to find many things that he doesn't do well.
BIG: Joel Embiid (PHI). 23.4 points, 11.8 rebounds, 59 TS%, +2.8 wins added
Embiid would rank higher at full strength, but he's missed about 1/3 of the season so far.
FLEX: Kyle Lowry (TOR). 19.7 points, 7.7 assists, 59 TS%, +3.2 wins added
Now age 34, Kyle Lowry continues to play very well on both ends. He's the little engine that could -- or perhaps more appropriately, the caboose.
6th TEAM
GUARD: Eric Bledsoe (MIL). 15.4 points, 5.4 assists, 58 TS%, +2.9 wins added
Eric Bledsoe gets more flak than credit, but he's still one of the best players on the best team in the league.
WING: Zach LaVine (CHI). 25.5 points, 4.2 assists, 57 TS%, +4.3 wins added
If the Bulls had a better record, Zach LaVine could have been a few spots higher. His defense isn't quite as bad as advertised either.
WING: C.J. McCollum (POR). 22.5 points, 4.3 assists, 54 TS%, +3.7 wins added
This must be the "all flak" team, because C.J. McCollum also gets blamed a lot for Portland's struggles to get over the hump. To me, Dame+CJ isn't the problem; the complete mess at the SF-PF position is to blame.
BIG: Domatas Sabonis (IND). 18.5 points, 12.4 rebounds, 59 TS%, +1.5 wins added
Arvydas' kid also has some baby Joker to his game, as his 5.0 assists are a huge part of Indiana's offense.
FLEX: Paul George (LAC). 21.0 points, 3.9 assists, 58 TS%, +2.5 wins added
Again, I'm factoring in games played more than most, and Paul George (42 GP) has missed quite a bit of time.
7th TEAM
GUARD: Kemba Walker (BOS). 21.2 points, 4.9 assists, 57 TS%, +2.5 wins added
Kemba Walker doesn't have the same workload in Boston as he did in Charlotte, and the stats reflect that. Still, he's safely one of the top 10 PGs in the league.
WING: Bojan Bogdanovic (UTA). 20.2 points, 4.1 rebounds, 60 TS%, +2.6 wins added
Here we're talking BOJAN (from Utah) and not BOGDAN (from Sacramento), although they're both good. Bogey's delivered on the three-point shooting for Utah, hitting 41.4% on 7+ attempts a game.
WING: Danilo Gallinari (OKC). 19.2 points, 5.5 rebounds, 61 TS%, +2.8 wins added
Perpetually underrated, it may be time we stop acting shocked when Gallo's teams (LAC last year, OKC this year) are better than people expect.
BIG: Karl-Anthony Towns (MIN). 26.5 points, 10.8 rebounds, 64 TS%, +2.7 wins added
KAT was among the hardest to rank for me. Offensively, he's historically great -- arguably the best shooting center of all time. The defense is an issue, of course, and the workload is what doomed him on my list. His 35 games played is our lowest total so far.
FLEX: Jrue Holiday (NO). 19.6 points, 6.9 assists, 54 TS%, +3.5 wins added
It's fitting that Jrue Holiday is listed at "flex," because he's gone from a pure point guard to a jack of all trades.
8th TEAM
GUARD: Ja Morant (MEM). 17.6 points, 6.9 assists, 57 TS%, +1.6 wins added
As the lead guard of a team, you expect Ja Morant to put up good raw stats. However, his efficiency and steadiness is remarkable for a rookie making the leap from Murray State. He also gets a boost for leading Memphis into playoff position (for now, until the NBA decides to snatch that away.)
WING: Evan Fournier (ORL). 18.8 points, 3.2 assists, 60 TS%, +2.1 wins added
Quietly, Evan Fournier is having a good season for Orlando. If you don't believe me, google it.
WING: Robert Covington (HOU). 12.8 points, 1.5 steals, 57 TS%, +2.8 wins added
Every team would love to have a low-usage 3+D forward like RoCo. Except for Philly and Minnesota, I guess.
BIG: Hassan Whiteside (POR). 16.3 points, 14.2 rebounds, 64 TS%, +2.1 wins added
This may be a controversial pick because Whiteside has become a punching bag for fans, but he may have made the rare transition from underrated to overrated (and overpaid) and back to underrated again.
FLEX: Tobias Harris (PHI). 19.4 points, 6.8 rebounds, 56 TS%, +2.1 wins added
Speaking of overpaid... Tobias Harris hasn't lived up to his giant contract yet, but he's undoubtedly a good starter to have on your team.
9th TEAM
GUARD: Spencer Dinwiddie (TOR). 20.6 points, 6.8 assists, 54 TS%, +3.0 wins added
Nothing raises your bitcoin valuation more than that sweet, sweet All-NBA 9th team trophy.
WING: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (OKC). 19.3 points, 6.1 rebounds, 57 TS%, +2.1 wins added
Like Jrue Holiday, SGA is a point who can play "up" a position. In fact, he’s been working effectively at both SG and SF this year, as illustrated by that nice rebounding rate.
WING: Duncan Robinson (MIA). 13.3 points, 3.3 rebounds, 68 TS%, +3.0 wins added
This may be high for a one-trick pony, but that trick happens to be quite a valuable one. The unknown Robinson is hitting 44.8% of his threes (at 8.4 attempts per game.) He's a huge part of Miami's offensive gameplan.
BIG: Kristaps Porzingis (DAL). 19.2 points, 9.5 rebounds, 54 TS%, +3.9 wins added
Too high? Too low? I can't figure out Porzingis' season in Dallas so far. Still, any big who can block shots and hit threes has an inherent value.
FLEX: Dennis Schroder (OKC). 19.0 points, 4.1 assists, 57 TS%, +5.4 wins added
Perhaps the biggest surprise to OKC's success this season has been a career year for Dennis Schroder off the bench. He's even played well when paired with CP3 and SGA in the same lineup. The stats suggest that Schroder should rank even higher than this, but I'm still trying to wrap my mind around him becoming such an efficient player all of a sudden.
10th TEAM
GUARD: Lou Williams (LAC). 18.7 points, 5.7 assists, 55 TS%, +3.6 wins added
Sweet Lou has a little less to do now that Kawhi Leonard and Paul George are in town, but he's still one of the best scorers off the bench.
WING: Buddy Hield (SAC). 19.8 points, 4.8 rebounds, 57 TS%, +3.0 wins added
A NEW addition to the "scorer off the bench club," Buddy Hield deserves kudos for accepting that role as the Kings try to find a spark. He hasn't been as red-hot as he had been last season, but he's still one of the best SGs in the league.
WING: Gordon Hayward (BOS). 17.3 points, 4.1 assists, 59 TS%, +1.9 wins added
Gordon Hayward has quietly been working his way back into top form, with his ball movement and BBIQ two real feathers in his cap. He's dinged a few spots here based on missed time (he's only played 45 games.)
BIG: Montrezl Harrell (LAC). 18.6 points, 7.1 rebounds, 61 TS%, +3.6 wins added
Fittingly, Montrezl Harrell will join Lou Williams' team here. It'll be interesting to see whether Doc Rivers rolls with the two of them in crunch time during the playoffs.
FLEX: Nikola Vucevic (ORL): 19.5 points, 11.0 rebounds, 54 TS%, +2.0 wins added
It's debatable how valuable Vucevic's 20-10 seasons are because he's not a good defender and he's not a terribly efficient scorer. That said, I'm giving him credit for a high degree of difficulty here as the go-to scorer on a team that doesn't have a lot of weapons offensively.
just missed the cut
If you'd like to sub in any other players, here are some notable names:
PG FredVanVleet (TOR), PG Devonte' Graham (CHA), PG Malcolm Brogdon (IND), PG Jamal Murray, PG Lonzo Ball, PG De'Aaron Fox (SAC), PG/SG Marcus Smart (BOS), PG/SG Kendrick Nunn (MIA), SF Joe Ingles (UTA), SF Will Barton (DEN), SF DeMar DeRozan (SA), SF/PF Davis Bertans (WAS), SF/PF Aaron Gordon (ORL), PF LaMarcus Aldridge (SA), C Myles Turner (IND), C Steven Adams (OKC), C Andre Drummond (CLE), C Jarrett Allen (BKN), C Derrick Favors (NO), C Jonas Valanciunas (MEM), C Brook Lopez (MIL). And of course, we need an obligatory Zion Williamson (NO) mention, although his 19 games played is a tough hurdle to overcome.
submitted by ZandrickEllison to nba [link] [comments]

Enviar e Receber Bitcoin na Coinbase  Dani Saints DON'T FALL FOR THIS BITCOIN TRAP Crypto News ➕Derivatives & Options Explained! BNB BITCOIN PRICE: PUMPING because of THIS!  Ethereum Miners make 60% PROFITS  Ampleforth 5,000% GAINS BITCOIN HEAVY ACCUMULATION!! BOTTOM IN ?!? ETHEREUM BREAKOUT ?!? Blockchain/Bitcoin for beginners 8: Bitcoin addresses, public key hash, P2PKH transactions

The original Bitcoin client source code thoroughly explains the reasoning behind Base58 coding: // Why base-58 instead of standard base-64 encoding? // – Don’t want 0OIl characters that look the same in some fonts and // could be used to create visually identical looking account numbers. The leading character '1', which has a value of zero in base58, is reserved for representing an entire leading zero byte, as when it is in a leading position, it has no value as a base-58 symbol. There can be one or more leading '1's when necessary to represent one or more leading zero bytes. Count the number of leading zero bytes that were the result of step 3 (for old Bitcoin addresses ... The leading character '1', which has a value of zero in base58, is reserved for representing an entire leading zero byte, as when it is in a leading position, has no value as a base-58 symbol. There can be one or more leading '1's when necessary to represent one or more leading zero bytes. Count the number of leading zero bytes that were the result of step 3 (for old Bitcoin addresses, there ... Bitcoin USD price, real-time (live) charts, bitcoin news and videos. Learn about BTC value, bitcoin cryptocurrency, crypto trading, and more. Bitcoin: Intended status: Informational: M. Sporny: Expires: May 30, 2020: Digital Bazaar: November 27, 2019 : The Base58 Encoding Scheme draft-msporny-base58-01. Abstract. This document specifies the base 58 encoding scheme, including an introduction to the benefits of the approach, the encoding and decoding algorithm, alternative alphabets, and security considerations. Status of This Memo ...

[index] [36624] [25767] [6532] [28012] [31628] [16937] [13902] [17897] [27953] [6763]

Enviar e Receber Bitcoin na Coinbase Dani Saints

Follow me on twitter for more frequently updates: https://twitter.com/TommyWorldPower In this video, I take a look at Bitcoin's price and the underlying grow... DISCLAIMER: This is not financial advice! This is an entertainment and opinion-based show. I am not a financial adviser. Please only invest what you can afford to lose, and we encourage you to do ... In today's video, I am going to take a look at Bitcoin's past two halvings and based on that information, make a optimistic and realistic price prediction for bitcoin for the May 2020 halving. Das Bitcoin Halving Event steht im Mai 2020 vor der Tür. Dann wird sich die Belohnung für die Bitcoin Miner von derzeit 12,5 Bitcoin (BTC) pro Block auf dann nur noch 6,25 BTC reduzieren. Die ... The Bitcoin price is going crazy right now. I have to admit that I like a $10,000 Bitcoin price more than anything. How long with the Bitcoin Price pump? Thats the question every Bitcoin investor ...